2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor based index tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , n} = S (t) 2 S (t) 1 and S (t) 2 S (t) 1 = ∅ (see (28), (29)), we obtain the result which was set out to prove.…”
Section: Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. , n} = S (t) 2 S (t) 1 and S (t) 2 S (t) 1 = ∅ (see (28), (29)), we obtain the result which was set out to prove.…”
Section: Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For instance, the price to pay for the full replication of the Russell 2000 index is estimated at 1.3% and 1.84% annually. These well-documented issues [5,12,18,28,29,31] hamper the use of a full replication approach and explain the success of partial replication approaches. Partial replication means that the fund manager is allowed to invest in a limited number of securities to track the benchmark [5,8,28,38,66,69,80].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea is that a portfolio that yielded in the past performance levels close to those of the benchmark will continue to do so in the future. The (total or average) squared deviation is one of the most popular tracking measures [5,28,38,76]. Other tracking metrics minimize the tracking error variance, the mean absolute deviation, the root squared mean error, and a power function of deviation (see [38] for a detailed discussion of the most popular tracking measures).…”
Section: Stochastic Index Tracking Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These well-documented issues [5,12,18,28,29,31] hamper the use of a full replication approach and explain the success of partial replication approaches. Partial replication means that the fund manager is allowed to invest in a limited number of securities to track the benchmark [5,8,28,38,66,69,80]. The requirement is enforced through the use of binary decision variables and the introduction of a cardinality constraint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corielli and Marcellino (2006) propose the use of factor analysis so that stocks are grouped around various factors depending on their past returns, and the tracking portfolio contains those stocks that best explain the variability of these factors. In their results, several stocks are used as representatives of each factor, so the tracking portfolio can include stocks that explain the same parts of the variability in the performance of the index.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%