2019
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor analysis, validity of the perceived implicit rationing of nursing care instrument and prevalence and patterns of unfinished nursing care in Slovakia

Abstract: Unfinished nursing care (UNC) is a well-recognized global problem often discussed within health professionals concerning the patient safety and quality of care. The phenomenon is referred to other related and interchangeably concepts emerging from contemporary nursing research (such as missed nursing care and implicit rationing). A great deal of international research groups (e.g., RN4CAST; RANCARE; MISSCARE STUDY GROUP) investigating the prevalence, predictors and outcomes of this phenomenon has been increasi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(74 reference statements)
4
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…periodically measuring unfinished care, which should be undertaken as a key strategy to increase patient safety and nursing care quality (Gurková et al, 2019); improving the work environment, supporting stress management and reducing nursing intake, which can be intervention points to promote high quality of care (Zúñiga et al, 2015); nursing leaders' efforts to improve the nursing work environment, which should include improving nurses' perceptions of the adequacy of staff and resources; and improving teamwork to reduce physician treatment and improve nurse outcomes and quality (Zhao et al, 2019). (Rascu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…periodically measuring unfinished care, which should be undertaken as a key strategy to increase patient safety and nursing care quality (Gurková et al, 2019); improving the work environment, supporting stress management and reducing nursing intake, which can be intervention points to promote high quality of care (Zúñiga et al, 2015); nursing leaders' efforts to improve the nursing work environment, which should include improving nurses' perceptions of the adequacy of staff and resources; and improving teamwork to reduce physician treatment and improve nurse outcomes and quality (Zhao et al, 2019). (Rascu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study also states the negative link between implicit care and patient‐centred care, revealing that the lower the implicit rationalization of health care, the more the patients have a better understanding of nurses, feel well informed and admit to receiving high‐quality patient‐centred care (Bachnick Ausserhofer, Baernholdt, & Simon, 2018). According to other studies, strategies that may be undertaken to reduce or eliminate implicit nursing care rationing are as follows: periodically measuring unfinished care, which should be undertaken as a key strategy to increase patient safety and nursing care quality (Gurková et al, 2019); improving the work environment, supporting stress management and reducing nursing intake, which can be intervention points to promote high quality of care (Zúñiga et al, 2015); nursing leaders’ efforts to improve the nursing work environment, which should include improving nurses’ perceptions of the adequacy of staff and resources; and improving teamwork to reduce physician treatment and improve nurse outcomes and quality (Zhao et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies (e.g. Gurková et al., 2019), the Principal Component Analysis was used to extract factors and assess the internal structure of the tool. The one‐factor solution accounted for most of the variance highlighting the unidimensional nature of the concept investigated in part A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Slovak Republic, the PIRNCA instrument was translated as a part of a research project conducted by authors (Gurková, Žiaková, 2017, unpublished personal communication) using the method of forward‐backwards translation and was further piloted in acute care settings on a study group of 264 RNs (Gurková et al, 2018). The psychometric testing of the instrument was previously performed in the national study (Gurková et al, 2019) but only with using one approach. We used a specific sample of RNs and two particular methods of testing the multidimensionality of the PIRNCA instrument.…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%