1979
DOI: 10.1080/00222216.1979.11969385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
157
0
24

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
157
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18 Thus, the minimum sample size required for sound factor analysis is 290 subjects which is near what Comrey and Lee 19 suggested as a good sample size. This study has a sample size of 410 which exceeds the cited requirement in the literature.…”
Section: Phase 2: Quantitative Strategymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…17,18 Thus, the minimum sample size required for sound factor analysis is 290 subjects which is near what Comrey and Lee 19 suggested as a good sample size. This study has a sample size of 410 which exceeds the cited requirement in the literature.…”
Section: Phase 2: Quantitative Strategymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Alanyazın incelendiğinde, ölçek geliştirme sürecinde işe koşulan AFA'nın güvenilir sonuçlar üretebilmesi için örneklem büyüklüğünün önemli olduğu görülmektedir (Catell, 1978;DeVellis, 2014;Field, 2005;Hair, Anderson, Tatham & Grablowsky, 1998;Kass & Tinsley, 1979;Tabachnick & Fidell, 2000;Tavşancıl, 2006). Örneklem büyüklüğüne ilişkin çeşitli çalışmalar, farklı sayı ve oranlar önermektedir (MacCallum, Widaman, Zhang & Hong, 1999).…”
Section: Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (Afa)unclassified
“…Örneklem büyüklüğüne ilişkin çeşitli çalışmalar, farklı sayı ve oranlar önermektedir (MacCallum, Widaman, Zhang & Hong, 1999). Ancak birçok çalışma, AFA için en uygun sayının 300 olduğunu ifade etmektedir (Field, 2009;Kass & Tinsley, 1979;Tabachnick & Fidell, 2000). Bunun yanında, bazı çalışmalar da örneklem büyüklüğünün madde sayısı ile orantılı olduğunu öne sürmektedir.…”
Section: Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (Afa)unclassified
“…This resulted in a sample size of 320 complete observations available for factor analysis procedures. This sample size of 320 was adequate to conduct factor analytic procedures 36,37 and offered a case-to-item ratio of approximately 6:1 for Part 1 and a case-to-item ratio of approximately 7:1 for Part 2 of the questionnaire. As an added check, the factor analyses were performed on the smaller sample of 230 with no imputed values for missing data.…”
Section: Missing Datamentioning
confidence: 99%