2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factor analyses of the Chinese Zarit Burden Interview among caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in a rural Chinese community

Abstract: ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the factor structure of the Chinese version of the 22-item Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) among family caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in China.MethodsUsing one-stage cluster-sampling design, 324 primary caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in Ningxiang County, Hunan Province, China, completed the Zarit Burden Interview face-to-face. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was first performed based on existing models to check model fit. Owing to an unsatisfactory r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(21 reference statements)
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scoring cut‐off points are as follows: 0–20 indicates little or no burden, 21–40 indicates a mild to moderate burden, 41–60 indicates a moderate to severe burden and 61–88 indicates a severe burden (Lai 2007). The overall Internal Consistency Reliability (Cronbach's α) of the Chinese version of the ZBI was 0.88, and the results of the factor analysis supported a five‐factor structure (Tang et al 2017). In this study, the Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.90.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The scoring cut‐off points are as follows: 0–20 indicates little or no burden, 21–40 indicates a mild to moderate burden, 41–60 indicates a moderate to severe burden and 61–88 indicates a severe burden (Lai 2007). The overall Internal Consistency Reliability (Cronbach's α) of the Chinese version of the ZBI was 0.88, and the results of the factor analysis supported a five‐factor structure (Tang et al 2017). In this study, the Cronbach's α of the scale was 0.90.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The ZBI consists of 22 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always), except for the final item on global burden, rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The total score ranges from 0 to 88 with higher scores indicating higher perceived burden [42,43]. The ZBI was first translated into Chinese by Lu et al [44] in 2009 and proved to be a reliable and valid measure of subjective caregiver burden.…”
Section: Subjective Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding such burdens is important for the development of efficient interventions and the rationalization of health-care resource allocation [5]. Many instruments have been developed to assess the burden on caregivers of people experiencing schizophrenia [16]. Family caregiver burden is a global issue [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%