Proceedings of 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2019) 2019
DOI: 10.22323/1.358.0665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FACT - Highlights from more than Seven Years of Unbiased Monitoring at TeV Energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional PMTs limit the duty cycle of Cherenkov telescopes [22,23], because bright light, such as the moon and stars light, significantly accelerates their aging. On the contrary, SiPMs can extend their duty cycle [24,25] given their capability of working under strong light illumination without noticeable aging effect. In addition, SiPMs are insensitive to magnetic fields, which is important for movable telescopes like WFCTA.…”
Section: General Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional PMTs limit the duty cycle of Cherenkov telescopes [22,23], because bright light, such as the moon and stars light, significantly accelerates their aging. On the contrary, SiPMs can extend their duty cycle [24,25] given their capability of working under strong light illumination without noticeable aging effect. In addition, SiPMs are insensitive to magnetic fields, which is important for movable telescopes like WFCTA.…”
Section: General Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the excellent performance stability of its silicon photomultiplier camera, FACT is an ideal monitoring instrument for bright TeV blazars. FACT continuously monitors 1ES 2344+51.4 and collected more than 1700 hr of observation time for this object after almost 8 years of operations [11].…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mrk 421 has been a known TeV -ray emitter since its detection by the Whipple telescope [3], and frequently shows enormous flux variations (see, e.g., [4]), exceeding a flux of 3 times the flux of the Crab Nebula at TeV energies (Crab Units, CU; see, e.g., [5], [6], [7]), as well as a correlation between optical and GeV emission [8] during flares. In addition, Aleksic et al (2015) found a correlation between TeV and X-ray emission during non-flaring emission states with zero time lag [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%