2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19260-9_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FACT: Flow-Based Approach for Connectivity Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these approaches typically rely on anomaly detection techniques for discovering, e.g., prefix hijacking, and are prone to false positives. Passive measurements from the data plane leverage user traffic, like in FACT [31] and Crowdsourcing Event Monitoring [9]. To exploit the benefits of active and passive measurements, some systems combine both approaches.…”
Section: Network Outage Monitoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, these approaches typically rely on anomaly detection techniques for discovering, e.g., prefix hijacking, and are prone to false positives. Passive measurements from the data plane leverage user traffic, like in FACT [31] and Crowdsourcing Event Monitoring [9]. To exploit the benefits of active and passive measurements, some systems combine both approaches.…”
Section: Network Outage Monitoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring systems using this architecture detect Internet-wide (or global) outages, which may be irrelevant for some domains. In contrast, some monitoring system, such as FACT [31], only monitor the traffic of a domain (i.e., ISP or AS) and the decision making process is performed by the same domain. While this means that only relevant outages are detected, the sys-tem cannot determine whether the outage is limited to a domain or is more widespread.…”
Section: Network Outage Monitoring Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations