1982
DOI: 10.2307/1771153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fact, Fiction, Fascism: Testimony and Mimesis in Holocaust Narratives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The author's 20 years of involvement with the Spanish Communist Party (PCE), as both a leading activist and an intellectual figure, have not generally been considered relevant to his literary aesthetics. Indeed, some of the most notorious commentators of his work explicitly rejected any direct connection between Semprun's political activity and his literary writing: Barbara Foley, in 1982, characterized Le grand voyage as an "irrealistic Holocaust novel," in direct opposition to "the realistic social novel" (348), and Ofelia Ferrán, in 2001, has made the case that "Le grand voyage is not a social realist novel at all" ("'Cuanto más escribo '" 290). Yet it is Semprun himself who alerts us to the relationship of his first novel with a communist ideology, in Quel beau dimanche!…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author's 20 years of involvement with the Spanish Communist Party (PCE), as both a leading activist and an intellectual figure, have not generally been considered relevant to his literary aesthetics. Indeed, some of the most notorious commentators of his work explicitly rejected any direct connection between Semprun's political activity and his literary writing: Barbara Foley, in 1982, characterized Le grand voyage as an "irrealistic Holocaust novel," in direct opposition to "the realistic social novel" (348), and Ofelia Ferrán, in 2001, has made the case that "Le grand voyage is not a social realist novel at all" ("'Cuanto más escribo '" 290). Yet it is Semprun himself who alerts us to the relationship of his first novel with a communist ideology, in Quel beau dimanche!…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dan Bar-On and Noga Gilad (1994) have observed that researchers, "through their too-strong conceptual framework, may overshadow the fragile language structures that survivors developed to describe those events" (p. 87). If such frameworks are developed from what Barbara Foley (1982) calls "the normative ethics inherited from nineteenth-century liberalism" (p. 348), Vol. 3, No.…”
Section: History As Taxidermymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He insists that all the people that he includes in his account were with him during his time in Auschwitz and Buchenwald (Cargas, 1976, p. 3). However, critical discussion of this story has suggested that Wiesel dramatized events in Auschwitz beyond sheer factuality in order both for the reader to gain a full picture of the horrors of Auschwitz and also for Wiesel to tell a story about fathers and sons enmeshed in the life and death struggle of an extermination camp (Foley, 1982;Hilberg, 2001;Loesberg, 1981;Schwarz, 1999;Weissman, 2004).…”
Section: Resolving Loss and Mourning In Elie Weisel's Account Of Fathmentioning
confidence: 99%