1989
DOI: 10.1016/0271-5309(89)90026-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
40
1
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
40
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are still relatively few studies on acoustic correlates of discourse and gender identity (see Clopper & Smiljanic 2011:238 and literature cited therein) that go beyond evolutionary observations (Ohala 1983, Gussenhoven 2002 29 patently than men. Some early studies had failed to produce actual data proving that there was any truth in the stereotype (Henton 1989(Henton , 1995, whereas Daly & Warren (2001:85) did find more pitch dynamism in (New Zealand) female speech compared to the prosodically 'flatter' speech of men, and the experiments discussed by Gussenhoven (2002, section 3.1) also show that there is some widespread expectation of wider pitch ranges in female than in male speech. Whatever the sociolinguistic interpretation of a more dynamic pitch use in female speech may be, we do find that women are more likely to use contour tones, i.e.…”
Section: Gender and Intonationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are still relatively few studies on acoustic correlates of discourse and gender identity (see Clopper & Smiljanic 2011:238 and literature cited therein) that go beyond evolutionary observations (Ohala 1983, Gussenhoven 2002 29 patently than men. Some early studies had failed to produce actual data proving that there was any truth in the stereotype (Henton 1989(Henton , 1995, whereas Daly & Warren (2001:85) did find more pitch dynamism in (New Zealand) female speech compared to the prosodically 'flatter' speech of men, and the experiments discussed by Gussenhoven (2002, section 3.1) also show that there is some widespread expectation of wider pitch ranges in female than in male speech. Whatever the sociolinguistic interpretation of a more dynamic pitch use in female speech may be, we do find that women are more likely to use contour tones, i.e.…”
Section: Gender and Intonationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reports have suggested that prosodic variation is wider in women than in men (Fitch & Holbrook, 1970;Graddol & Swann, 1983;Hudson & Holbrook, 1981;Stoicheff, 1981), although there is some disagreement on this point (cf. Henton, 1989). Bachorowski and Owren (1999) reported linear discriminant analysis results using acoustic measures made from the vowel / / in the word test.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers in language and gender have found differences in perception and use of intonational patterns of females versus males (e.g. Brend 1972;Fichtelius, Johansson, and Nordin 1980;Ohara 1992; but see Henton 1989). Stereotypically, female speech includes a greater intonation range than male speech (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her study suggested that men avoid the highest level of pitch that women use, giving men a smaller range of pitch than women. Her work led to other linguistic research on male and female intonation based on informal observations (e.g., Lakoff 1975;McConnell-Ginet 1983), to acoustic analysis of gender-based intonational patterns (e.g., Fichtelius, Johansson, and Nordin 1980;Henton 1989Henton , 1995, and to the first investigations on whether sexual orientation might have an intonational correlation (Gaudio 1994;Moonwoman 1985). Gaudio (1994) investigated whether the stereotype of gay men's pitch being more dynamic than non-gay men's pitch would be reflected in a controlled perceptual study and in acoustic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%