2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-019-00121-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facing the Pariah of Science: The Frankenstein Myth as a Social and Ethical Reference for Scientists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The downturn in trust in vaccines may be a manifestation not only of declining trust in physicians, but also of a broader social trend of diminishing trust in science [ 12 ]. While some people respect science and scientists, others are skeptical of them [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. When it comes to scientific work in the medical field, some individuals think that scientists are ‘under the thumb’ of pharmaceutical companies and suspect them of putting profits above public interest, [ 5 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downturn in trust in vaccines may be a manifestation not only of declining trust in physicians, but also of a broader social trend of diminishing trust in science [ 12 ]. While some people respect science and scientists, others are skeptical of them [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]. When it comes to scientific work in the medical field, some individuals think that scientists are ‘under the thumb’ of pharmaceutical companies and suspect them of putting profits above public interest, [ 5 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I have argued that an approach which foregrounds optimism beneficially models ethical reflection, but this is not a call to exclude totally the use of negative or dystopian material. For instance, Mary Shelley's classic science fiction novel Frankenstein: Or, the Modern Prometheus (1818), which presents one of the most famous examples of poor scientific ethics, has stood the test of time as a touchstone of scientific ethics discussion and sets forth norms for the scientific community about danger, ethical behavior, and creators' responsibility to what they create (Nagy et al, 2020). However, models for students to emulate create a clearer sense of what is possible for those who commit to ethical fortitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk here is that an engineer is able to project their anxieties on to the fictional character to improve their self-perception. It is also possible that such anti-exemplars generate a space where bad actions appear good by comparison [10]. The next few paragraphs further explore these issues before moving on to highlight the advantages of the fiction in ethics education.…”
Section: Considering Future Ethical Behavior Through the Use Of Fiction In A Project-based Engineering Program Introduction And Backgrounmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, by design, fiction may force us to confront aspects of our being that make us uncomfortable [11]. For example, an examination of Victor Frankenstein, from Mary Shelly's Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus [17], in professional education may help scientists' frame ethical thinking particularly around unintended consequences [10]. Despite this discomfort, because fiction is separate from reality, it provides a way to approach sensitive topics in an unbiased way [12] [4].…”
Section: Considering Future Ethical Behavior Through the Use Of Fiction In A Project-based Engineering Program Introduction And Backgrounmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation