2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14874-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facing the Lernaean Hydra: The Nature of Large-Scale Integration Projects in Healthcare

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Massive amounts of pre-allocated resources [38] are wasted while the systems are either inoperable or end up being discarded [30,36,39,40,41]. Thus, when countries have been developing CGISs, the room for errors has been exceeded.…”
Section: Healthcare Information Systems As a Critical Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Massive amounts of pre-allocated resources [38] are wasted while the systems are either inoperable or end up being discarded [30,36,39,40,41]. Thus, when countries have been developing CGISs, the room for errors has been exceeded.…”
Section: Healthcare Information Systems As a Critical Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenge for those designing healthcare IS is to balance the restriction and promotion of generativity (Grimmelman and Ohm, 2010). In a public healthcare setting, healthcare authorities play a large role in the purchase and design of systems and do not always facilitate an evolutionary design processes or include users (Larsen and Ellingsen, 2010). This limits the close cooperation between users and designers.…”
Section: Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, some of the same problems visible in eHealth and other critical eGovernment systems can be found in the biometric passport control system as well. In this case the common problems were detection of problems after adoption and the poor implementation of security (Mercuri, 2001;Fleischman, 2010;Heimo et al, 2010;Larsen and Elligsen, 2010). Other problems were the possibility for biometric data to be stolen, unequal treatment of EU -and local citizens and the erosion of privacy.…”
Section: Jices 102mentioning
confidence: 99%