2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61546-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facility Layout Planning Using Self-Organization Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, members of the systems are individually able to achieve simple tasks, but their interactions lead to the emergence of complex collective behavior [28] [52]. In self-organizing systems, agents also communicate with each other indirectly: they use stigmergy (following ant communities) [45] [47] [53] or attraction-repulsion fields [54] [55]. Though, currently there is no generic coordination method that could be applied in engineering self-organizing systems [1].…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Typically, members of the systems are individually able to achieve simple tasks, but their interactions lead to the emergence of complex collective behavior [28] [52]. In self-organizing systems, agents also communicate with each other indirectly: they use stigmergy (following ant communities) [45] [47] [53] or attraction-repulsion fields [54] [55]. Though, currently there is no generic coordination method that could be applied in engineering self-organizing systems [1].…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facility layout planning by using self-organizing principles is described in [55] where the planning proceeds by local interactions between machines and AGVs, without global control. Self-organization is exploited in [87] where a decomposition of manufacturing objectives and the allocation of tasks to work systems is arranged.…”
Section: Production Planning and Resource Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this system, all production elements can move freely on the production floor using self-organization in order to adapt to fluctuations such as the diversity of product demands and the malfunction of machines. The effectiveness and feasibility of this system is demonstrated by computer simulations and by a prototypical mini-factory consisting of small autonomous robots [100], [101], [102]. Simulation results demonstrated that the proposed model can achieve global objectives such as "maximise the throughput" and "minimise the due date deviation".…”
Section: Layout Designmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Dynamically evolving perspectives and collective innovation are requisites for the self-organizing systems designed for manufacturing control. Ueda et al proposed biological manufacturing systems that adapt to diverse production demands and malfunctions [131], as well as autonomously generating facility layout plans [132]. The random manufacturing system proposed by Iwata et al [133] adaptively generates manufacturing schedules, while contending with dynamically changing orders.…”
Section: Related Cirp Efforts and Initiativesmentioning
confidence: 99%