Facilitators and barriers to the effective implementation of the individual maternal near-miss case reviews in low/middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Abstract

BackgroundThe maternal near-miss cases review (NMCR), a type of clinical audit, proved to be effective in improving quality of care and decreasing maternal mortality in low/middle-income countries (LMICs). However, challenges in its implementation have been described.ObjectivesSynthesising the evidence on facilitators and barriers to the effective implementation of NMCR in LMICs.DesignSystematic review of qualitative studies.Data sourcesMEDLINE, LILACS, Global Health Library, SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI, Cochrane library and Embase were searched in December 2017.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesQualitative studies exploring facilitators and/or barriers of implementing NMCR in LMIC were included.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers extracted data, performed thematic analysis and assessed risk of bias.ResultsOut of 25 361 papers retrieved, 9 studies from Benin, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cote D’Ivoire, Ghana, Malawi, Morocco, Tanzania, Uganda could be included in the review. The most frequently reported barriers to NMCR implementation were the following: absence of national guidelines and local protocols; insufficient training on how to perform the audit; lack of leadership, coordination, monitoring and supervision; lack of resources and work overload; fear of blame and punishment; poor knowledge of evidenced-based medicine; hierarchical differences among staff and poor understating of the benefits of the NMCR. Major facilitators to NMCR implementation included: good leadership and coordination; training of all key staff; a good cultural environment; clear staff’s perception on the benefits of conducting audit; patient empowerment and the availability of external support.ConclusionsIn planning the NMCR implementation in LMICs, policy-makers should consider actions to prevent and mitigate common challenges to successful NMCR implementation. Future studies should aim at documenting facilitators and barriers to NMCR outside the African Region.

Women’s suggestions on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn hospital care: a qualitative study in Italy using the WHO standards as framework for the analysis

“…Each theme was then further expanded, based on the themes emerging from women's comments, to develop the final axial coding scheme. Axial coding is widely accepted in qualitative literature as a sufficient method to disaggregate core themes during qualitative analysis [26][27][28]. Two researchers applied independently the axial codes systematically to the data by hand-sorting the text units into themes and sub-themes.…”

Implementation of the WHO manual for Robson classification: an example from Sri Lanka using a local database for developing quality improvement recommendations

“…Despite not all recommendations developed fitting into the remit of SMART,17 the process still provided the opportunity to discuss clinical practice using objective data in a constructive, participatory manner, and resulted in a concrete list of actions. Activities agreed on aligned with evidenced-based recommendations on effective interventions for improved health worker performance,45 also taking into account previous experience of the team 46–50…”

The burden of severe maternal outcomes and indicators of quality of maternal care in Nigerian hospitals: a secondary analysis comparing two large facility‐based surveys

“…Implementation of a near‐miss case review system should consider not only the data requirements (i.e. the need for a reliable, functioning maternal near‐miss surveillance system) but also the need for resources, staff training, and support in conducting effective near‐miss case reviews . Future research around maternal near‐miss in Nigeria could include benchmarking the performance of health facilities based on their near‐miss indicators in order to identify (and emulate) the best‐performing health facilities, and further implementation research to ensure that the near‐miss approach is widely and effectively used.…”