2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitative effects of social partners on Java sparrow activity

Abstract: Group-living animals can affect each other's behaviour, causing changes in the rate or type of behaviours performed (social facilitation), or convergence in behaviour to that displayed by the majority of neighbours (social conformity). Facilitation and conformity effects can act to reduce direct competition and/or enable social coordination, and the degree to which individuals can affect each other's behaviour can depend upon the identities and traits of those interacting. To investigate the effect of social p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, for researchers interested in “higher order” group‐ and population‐level behaviors, it is necessary to incorporate such individual‐level variation into their studies (King et al., 2018). However, where individual‐level data are collected in isolation (i.e., solitary individuals) we urge caution using these data to build data‐ or theory‐driven movement models, since variation in the social environment can profoundly alter the expression of movement and behavior (e.g., Fürtbauer & Fry, 2018; Herbert‐Read et al., 2013; King et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2020), and this poses a new challenge for researchers in both areas. In short, the two research areas should continue to collaborate to advance their respective and combined fields of research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, for researchers interested in “higher order” group‐ and population‐level behaviors, it is necessary to incorporate such individual‐level variation into their studies (King et al., 2018). However, where individual‐level data are collected in isolation (i.e., solitary individuals) we urge caution using these data to build data‐ or theory‐driven movement models, since variation in the social environment can profoundly alter the expression of movement and behavior (e.g., Fürtbauer & Fry, 2018; Herbert‐Read et al., 2013; King et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2020), and this poses a new challenge for researchers in both areas. In short, the two research areas should continue to collaborate to advance their respective and combined fields of research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We highlight these validations because neophobia experiments sometimes lack multiple novel object or control trials, which can make results difficult to interpret [33]. Matched-phenotype pairing indicated a marginal negative effect ( p = 0.07) of having a cage mate on feeding likelihood in the presence of a novel object (congruent with [13,17,19,21,39] but see [14,16]). This is not an effect of competition to feed because this was not observed during control trials (no object).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Novel object trials are commonly used to evaluate social effects on individual exploratory behaviour in many taxa, including fish [9][10][11], mammals [12,13] and birds [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In a social environment, fish [10,11] and birds [14,19,22] generally behave more similarly to other animals in that environment (social conformity hypothesis [23]) rather than emphasizing individual differences to reduce competition and increase social coordination (social facilitation hypothesis [24]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the relationships between personality and multiple cognitive abilities, we measured the exploratory behaviour in Java Sparrows Lonchura oryzivora , a highly social passerine species with small body size (Islam 1997). Java Sparrow, traditionally domesticated as pets, could well adapt the laboratory environment and have been used as study objects in several behavioural studies (Furutani et al 2018, Umemoto et al 2019, Zhang et al 2020, Wang et al 2022, Chen et al 2023). A series of cognitive tasks, including a colour association task, a colour reversal task, and a detour-reaching task, were used to quantify the capacity for discrimination learning, reversal learning, and inhibitory control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%