1989
DOI: 10.3758/bf03205213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitation and impairment of conditioning in the preweanling rat after prior exposure to the conditioned stimulus

Abstract: Olfactory aversion conditioning of preweanling rats, 10 or 18 days postnatal, was tested after some had been given nonreinforced experience with the to-be-conditioned odor stimulus. In three experiments, it was established that the amount of prior exposure to the es determined the effectiveness of conditioning. For both ages, odor-shock conditioning was more likely impaired with longer durations of preexposure. This effect was more apparent in the older animals. Low to moderate degrees of prior exposure to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
31
1
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
31
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the possibility remains that the well-known effect of latent inhibition operates in a different way in infants. Hoffmann and Spear (1989) have shown that, using parameters with which a retardation of conditioning would be observed in adult rats, a facilitatory effect may be found with infants; and that in order to observe latent inhibition infants need more experience with the stimuli, i.e., more preexposure trials (Hoffmann & Spear, 1989). This was assessed in the following experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the possibility remains that the well-known effect of latent inhibition operates in a different way in infants. Hoffmann and Spear (1989) have shown that, using parameters with which a retardation of conditioning would be observed in adult rats, a facilitatory effect may be found with infants; and that in order to observe latent inhibition infants need more experience with the stimuli, i.e., more preexposure trials (Hoffmann & Spear, 1989). This was assessed in the following experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familiarity may induce a higher intake of the tastant, probably by reducing neophobia (although this effect was not clearly evidenced with all tastants due to the low neophobic responses displayed at this age), whereas increased reactivity to the tastants may reflect not only a shift in their hedonic value but also, or alternatively, a better processing of their pleasant and unpleasant orosensory properties. This last interpretation is closely linked to the phenomenon of perceptual priming and with those processes underlying the facilitation of conditioning observed after stimulus preexposure in both infant rats (Chotro & Alonso, 1999;Chotro & Alonso, 2001;Hoffmann & Spear, 1989) and adult animals (Bennett, Tremain, & Mackintosh, 1996). In relation to this, and based on previous studies carried out in our laboratory, it may be hypothesized that an increase in the number of stimulus exposures may eventually prompt a reduced reactivity in infant rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hoffman and Spear (1989) found a strong latent inhibition effect in both 10-and 18-day-old rats. In their experiments, the CS was an odor and the US was footshock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%