1997
DOI: 10.2307/749784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitating Student Interactions in Mathematics in a Cooperative Learning Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
18
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with the literature findings (Sharan, 1980;Slavin, Madden, & Leavey, 1984;Leikin & Zaslavsky, 1997;Johnson & Johnson, 1981Tarım, 2003;Artut & Tarim, 2007) that suggested cooperative learning method was effective on mathematics teaching. Leikin and Zaslavsky (1999) emphasized that the students generally improved their problem-solving skills while learning mathematics in groups based on cooperation, they could solve more abstract problems and improve their mathematical understanding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is consistent with the literature findings (Sharan, 1980;Slavin, Madden, & Leavey, 1984;Leikin & Zaslavsky, 1997;Johnson & Johnson, 1981Tarım, 2003;Artut & Tarim, 2007) that suggested cooperative learning method was effective on mathematics teaching. Leikin and Zaslavsky (1999) emphasized that the students generally improved their problem-solving skills while learning mathematics in groups based on cooperation, they could solve more abstract problems and improve their mathematical understanding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…One of the reasons of this is its positive effects on academic achievement (Sharan, 1980;Slavin, Madden, & Leavey, 1984;Johnson & Johnson, 1981Leikin & Zaslavsky, 1997;Tarım, 2003;Artut & Tarım, 2007;Roseth, Johnson, & Johnson, 2008;Slavin, 2011Slavin, , 2015. Although the studies about this learning method have focused on primary and secondary education, it is expressed in the discussions about the benefits of this method that it is also applicable at bachelor degree classes (Emley, 1986;Dees, 1991;Garfield, 1993;Kaptan & Korkmaz, 1995;Artut & Tarım, 2007;Johnson et al, 1998Johnson et al, , 2013Van Voorhis, 1995;Slavin, 2015).…”
Section: Effect Of Cooperative Learning Methods 246mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such settings, students develop their mathematical knowledge through the many opportunities they have to offer explanations to their peers (Davidson & Kroll, 1991;Good, Mulryan, & McCaslin, 1992;Newman & Goldin, 1990;Webb, 1985Webb, , 1991. Leikin and Zaslavsky (1997) studied directly the effect of teaching on learning through a special cooperative small-group setting in which students played the role of mathematics teachers. They found that students gained mathematical understanding as a result of explaining their solutions to their peers.…”
Section: Learning Through Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leikin and Zaslavsky (1997) pointed out that cooperative settings facilitated students' activeness and mathematical communications (e.g., asking questions, giving explanations, and requesting help). Giving related-content explanations and observing other group members interacting are positively related to mathematic achievement (see Webb, 1991, for a review).…”
Section: Benefits Of Cooperative Learning For Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%