Facilitating organisational decision making: a change risk assessment model case study

Apostolopoulos, Charalampos; Halikias, George; Maroukian, Krikor; Tsaramirsis, Georgios

doi:10.1108/jm2-05-2014-0035

Cited by 15 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Using verbal descriptors (low, medium, or high), 26 risk weights, 25,34,38,49,59,61 encoding, 30,40,52,60,61 scoring tables, [25][26][27]30,32,37 Bayesian methods, 46 Monte Carlo method, 46,60 and historical data, 49 suggested for estimating the severity and probability of risk in executive levels of HCOs.…”

Section: Risk Estimation (Severity and Consequences And Likelihood Esmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In quantitative risk estimation methods (Monte Carlo and Bayesian), activities find a probabilistic form and a distribution function is specified for them. 46,60 In qualitative risk estimation methods, risks are prioritized based on their potential impacts on project objectives based on qualitative variables. Qualitative methods of risk estimation can either lead to further analysis in quantitative risk estimation or directly to risk response planning.…”

Section: Risk Estimation (Severity and Consequences And Likelihood Esmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Qualitative methods of risk estimation can either lead to further analysis in quantitative risk estimation or directly to risk response planning. 30,60 Interview with experts, 32,53 questionnaire design, 32,61 Delphi method or expert, 60 and focus group, 38,44,46,[49][50][51]53 identified an applied method for risk estimation in executive levels of HCOs.…”

Section: Risk Estimation (Severity and Consequences And Likelihood Esmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…sizes or bands of fatalities are 1-10, 11-100, and 101-1000), 30,40 risk matrix, 25,33,43,52,53,57 graphs or diagrams (e.g. Frequency-Number (F-N) curve), 35,46 and maps (e.g. risk contour plot).…”

Section: Risk Presentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…26,30 The best performance measures can be selected based on criteria such as safety, profitability, quality, efficiency, effectiveness, time, cost, available resources, performance, environmental conditions, and satisfaction. 41,42,45,46,59 In one study, AHP/ANP and BOCR (benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks) used to select the best RM strategies. 41…”

Section: Rm Measures and Decision-makingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

Ferdosi

Rezayatmand

Taleghani

2020

RMHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study attempted to present a framework and appropriate techniques for implementing risk management (RM) in executive levels of healthcare organizations (HCOs) and grasping new future research opportunities in this field. Methods: A scoping review was conducted of all English language studies, from January 2000 to October 2018 in the main bibliographic databases. Review selection and characterization were performed by two independent reviewers using pretested forms. Results: Following a keyword search and an assessment of fit for this review, 37 studies were analyzed. Based on the findings and considering the ISO31000 model, a comprehensive yet simple framework of risk management is developed for the executive levels of HCOs. It includes five main phases: establishing the context, risk assessment, risk treatment, monitoring and review, and communication and consultation. A set of tools and techniques were also suggested for use at each phase. Also, the status of risk management in the executive levels of HCOs was determined based on the proposed framework. Conclusion: The framework can be used as a training tool to guide in effective risk assessment as well as a tool to assess non-clinical risks of healthcare organizations. Managers of healthcare organizations who seek to ensure high quality should use a range of risk management methods and tools in their organizations, based on their need, and not assume that each tool is comprehensive.

show abstract

Section: Risk Estimation (Severity and Consequences And Likelihood Esmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Risk Estimation (Severity and Consequences And Likelihood Esmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Risk Estimation (Severity and Consequences And Likelihood Esmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Risk Presentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Rm Measures and Decision-makingmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

Ferdosi

Rezayatmand

Taleghani

2020

RMHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Addressing the Emerging Healthcare Environment: Risk Assessment for Healthcare 5.0

Rai,

Dhull,

Singh

et al. 2024

Engineering Cyber-Physical Systems and Critical Infrastructures

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

GPS-Based Route Choice Model for Smart Transportation System: Bringing Intelligence into Vehicular Cloud

Potluri

Mohanty²,

Rao³

et al. 2022

Machine Intelligence and Data Science Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Facilitating organisational decision making: a change risk assessment model case study

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link:

Cited by 15 publications

References 31 publications

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

Addressing the Emerging Healthcare Environment: Risk Assessment for Healthcare 5.0

GPS-Based Route Choice Model for Smart Transportation System: Bringing Intelligence into Vehicular Cloud

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About