2018
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1461621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitating epistemic fluency through design thinking: a strategy for the broader application of studio pedagogy within higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students might even be placed in cross-disciplinary groups with student expertise specifically chosen to be relevant for the problem they are solving. Educational scholars McLaughlan and Lodge (2019), for example, placed students in groups with majors in architecture, marketing, sociology, and anthropology when the students were tasked with designing a palliative care studio (p. 92). In short, working in groups allows students and designers to accomplish tasks they are not able to do when working alone: groups have an enhanced ability to generate diverse ideas and provide feedback, and this allows them to move past nonobvious solutions and solve problems of a higher complexity.…”
Section: Literature Review: Dt In Tpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students might even be placed in cross-disciplinary groups with student expertise specifically chosen to be relevant for the problem they are solving. Educational scholars McLaughlan and Lodge (2019), for example, placed students in groups with majors in architecture, marketing, sociology, and anthropology when the students were tasked with designing a palliative care studio (p. 92). In short, working in groups allows students and designers to accomplish tasks they are not able to do when working alone: groups have an enhanced ability to generate diverse ideas and provide feedback, and this allows them to move past nonobvious solutions and solve problems of a higher complexity.…”
Section: Literature Review: Dt In Tpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,46 As a result, Biomedical Engineering education modules allow students to develop solutions that address practical, challenging, and realworld design issues imposed by medical devices and help them adopt a user-centric approach to address the needs shared by healthcare professionals. 22,37,59 While various adaptations of design processes are available, 2,8,11,27,31,33,38,57 they all ultimately apply variations of user-centric design methods that encourage creative and innovative mindsets. A usercentric design approach is even more important in medical devices as user interactions form a critical part of a successful healthcare system, mainly due to multiple stakeholders who interact with the medical devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research‐focused studios are not unusual within architectural education (Bates et al 2015; Jasper 2014; Varnelis 2007). These typically seek to provide the following learning outcomes: the skills to identify new questions that should be asked in the context of our built environment; the ability to obtain the knowledge necessary to propose solutions to those problems; and the confidence to propose them (Cuff et al 2010; Healey 2005; McLaughlan & Lodge 2019). Yet, while studio project outcomes are often published, the underlying pedagogical strategies that facilitate quality research outcomes are seldom discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%