2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facilitating adaptation and intercultural contact: The role of integration and multicultural ideology in dominant and non-dominant groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
60
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
9
60
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The Russians and the Ossetians who recognized intergroup differences and respected equal rights and who held a positive attitude toward multiculturalism preferred the integration strategy/expectation. Similar results have been found in studies of dominant and nondominant groups in Hong Kong (Hui et al, 2015) and in a study of Dutch majority-group members (Schalk-Soekar & Van de Vijver, 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Russians and the Ossetians who recognized intergroup differences and respected equal rights and who held a positive attitude toward multiculturalism preferred the integration strategy/expectation. Similar results have been found in studies of dominant and nondominant groups in Hong Kong (Hui et al, 2015) and in a study of Dutch majority-group members (Schalk-Soekar & Van de Vijver, 2008).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, an analysis of the research showed that cross-ethnic friendships are positively related to social competence and life satisfaction (e.g., Feddes, Noack, & Rutland, 2009;Hui, Chen, Leung, & Berry, 2015;Hunter & Elias, 1999;Lease & Blake, 2005;Tropp & Prenovost, 2008). Research with young adults suggests that cross-ethnic friendships are related to psychological well-being (Mendoza-Denton & Page-Gould, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a multicultural society, day-to-day intercultural encounters are inevitable and are of vital importance (Hui, Chen, Leung, & Berry, 2015). In order to understand intercultural relations in the KBR, we tested three hypotheses of intercultural relations: multiculturalism, integration, and contact (Berry, 2013a).…”
Section: The Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results they obtained generally support the contact hypothesis: intergroup contact is usually negatively related to pronounced prejudices, in both the dominant and the nondominant groups. In addition, cross-ethnic friendships are related to psychological well-being (Bagci, Rutland, Kumashiro, Smith, & Blumberg, 2014;Hui et al, 2015;Mendoza-Denton & Page-Gould, 2008). Berry (2011) has proposed that the choice of an integration strategy is related to a greater number of ethnic minorities or migrants becoming successfully adapted.…”
Section: The Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Социальный капитал и аккультурационные... Предыдущие исследования показывали, что кон-такты и дружеские отношения с представителями местного населения способствуют ассимиляции ми-грантов [32]. Ассимиляция в нашем исследовании оказалась не связанной с социокультурной адапта-цией, что также не соответствует предыдущим иссле-дованиям, показавшим, что мигранты, предпочитаю-щие ассимиляцию, оказываются более успешными в плане социокультурной адаптации [34], в том числе в сравнении с мигрантами, предпочитающими инте-грацию [27].…”
Section: обсуждение результатовunclassified