2016
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201609838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile Reductive Silylation of UO22+ to Uranium(IV) Chloride

Abstract: General reductive silylation of the UO cation occurs readily in a one-pot, two-step stoichiometric reaction at room temperature to form uranium(IV) siloxides. Addition of two equivalents of an alkylating reagent to UO X (L) (X=Cl, Br, I, OTf; L=triphenylphosphine oxide, 2,2'-bipyridyl) followed by two equivalents of a silyl (pseudo)halide, R Si-X (R=aryl, alkyl, H; X=Cl, Br, I, OTf, SPh), cleanly affords (R SiO) UX (L) in high yields. Support is included for the key step in the process, reduction of U to U . T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 A second irreversible redox event is observed at E 1/2 = –2.47 V vs. Fc/Fc + for complex 2 , but not for complex 1 . This event is consistent with the reduction of the metal centre (values of redox potential ranging from –2.02 to –2.88 V vs. Fc/Fc + were previously assigned to the U( v )/U( iv ) couple 12 a ). The possibility that this event could be related to the reduction of the Schiff base ligand is unlikely since this feature is absent from the voltammograms of the H 3 trensal, K 3 trensal ligands and of the complex 1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 18 A second irreversible redox event is observed at E 1/2 = –2.47 V vs. Fc/Fc + for complex 2 , but not for complex 1 . This event is consistent with the reduction of the metal centre (values of redox potential ranging from –2.02 to –2.88 V vs. Fc/Fc + were previously assigned to the U( v )/U( iv ) couple 12 a ). The possibility that this event could be related to the reduction of the Schiff base ligand is unlikely since this feature is absent from the voltammograms of the H 3 trensal, K 3 trensal ligands and of the complex 1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the binding of strong Lewis acids such as B(C 6 F 5 ) 3 to the uranyl( v ) oxo groups renders more accessible the reduction of U( v ) to U( iv ). 10d , 11 , 12 A fewer studies have been directed to investigate the effect of the interaction of uranyl( v ) with 3d transition metals on the stability and redox reactivity of uranyl( v ) species. Moreover, in spite of the fact that several uranyl( v ) complexes stable in organic solution have been isolated in recent years, 9 , 13 only a few examples of heteropolymetallic complexes presenting a UO 2 + ···M interaction, where M is a 3d transition metal, have been prepared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1 H NMR spectrum of the reaction mixture, when compared to the spectrum of 2 in D 2 O at pH 8.5, revealed the quantitative conversion of 1 into the uranyl(V) species [UO 2 (dpaea)] À (Scheme 2; Supporting Information, Figure S4). Crystals of (6) were obtained by slow evaporation of the H 2 O solution at room temperature ( Figure 2; Supporting Information, Figure S21). The structure shows a dimer with two anionic {UO 2 (dpaea)(H 2 O)} À moieties bridged by two Na cations binding the carboxylate oxygen atoms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant progress has been made in recent years in the development of systems that allowed the reduction of uranyl(VI) to uranyl(V) . In contrast, fewer examples of controlled reduction of uranyl(VI) and uranyl(V) complexes to well‐defined U IV compounds have been reported and they all require the preliminary functionalization of the two uranyl oxo ligands with Lewis acids or metal cations…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%