2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.04.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile one-step exfoliation of large-size 2D materials via simply shearing in triethanolamine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Definitely, we estimate a density of defects as low as (8 ± 2) × 10 9 cm –2 , which is consistent with the high crystalline order of exfoliated graphene flakes (without evidence of defects) imaged by high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) in Figure S11 of the Supporting Information. For the sake of comparison, from the I (D)/ I (G) analysis in Raman spectra ( Figure 7 and Figure S12 of the Supporting Information), we also estimated the density of defects for graphene exfoliated with NMP, 79 , 122 Cyrene, 79 IPA, 123 DMF, 124 acetone/water, 125 ethanol/water, 126 TEA, 73 and aqueous solution of urea, 74 finding values of (6 ± 2) × 10 10 , (5 ± 2) × 10 10 , (1.0 ± 0.3) × 10 11 , (9 ± 3) × 10 10 , (4 ± 1) × 10 10 , (2.6 ± 0.7) × 10 11 , (6 ± 2) × 10 10 , and (7 ± 2) × 10 10 defects/cm 2 , respectively. Evidently, graphene flakes exfoliated with Polarclean exhibit a density of defects inferior by approximately 1 order of magnitude with respect to LPE assisted by other solvents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitely, we estimate a density of defects as low as (8 ± 2) × 10 9 cm –2 , which is consistent with the high crystalline order of exfoliated graphene flakes (without evidence of defects) imaged by high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) in Figure S11 of the Supporting Information. For the sake of comparison, from the I (D)/ I (G) analysis in Raman spectra ( Figure 7 and Figure S12 of the Supporting Information), we also estimated the density of defects for graphene exfoliated with NMP, 79 , 122 Cyrene, 79 IPA, 123 DMF, 124 acetone/water, 125 ethanol/water, 126 TEA, 73 and aqueous solution of urea, 74 finding values of (6 ± 2) × 10 10 , (5 ± 2) × 10 10 , (1.0 ± 0.3) × 10 11 , (9 ± 3) × 10 10 , (4 ± 1) × 10 10 , (2.6 ± 0.7) × 10 11 , (6 ± 2) × 10 10 , and (7 ± 2) × 10 10 defects/cm 2 , respectively. Evidently, graphene flakes exfoliated with Polarclean exhibit a density of defects inferior by approximately 1 order of magnitude with respect to LPE assisted by other solvents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few‐layer MoS 2 nanosheets were prepared via liquid‐phase exfoliation of their bulk powder in TEOA solution according to our previously reported work . In a typical procedure, accompanied by intermittent ultrasonic agitation, 2 g of MoS 2 powder was dispersed into 200 mL of TEOA with continuous mechanical stirring at a speed of 1000 rpm for 8 h at room temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other green alternatives [triethanolamine ( Chen et al, 2017 )—TEA–and urea aqueous solutions ( He et al, 2015 )] have been tested for the LPE of graphite. In Table 1 , we summarize the features of these green solvents, comparing them to conventional ones.…”
Section: Towards Green Solvents For the Lpe Of Graphitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 1 , we summarize the features of these green solvents, comparing them to conventional ones. In the single report currently available on the use of TEA, the authors obtained dispersions of crystalline graphene flakes with high stability (over 9 months) ( Chen et al, 2017 ). However, TEA can induce detrimental chemical modifications in the flakes, possibly due to functionalization ( Song et al, 2015 ; Ryu et al, 2017 ; Paolucci et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Towards Green Solvents For the Lpe Of Graphitementioning
confidence: 99%