2019
DOI: 10.1002/app.47502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile modification of polysulfone hollow‐fiber membranes via the incorporation of well‐dispersed iron oxide nanoparticles for protein purification

Abstract: Protein existence in wastewater is an important issue in wastewater management because proteins are generally present as contaminants and foulants. Hence, in this study, we focused on designing a polysulfone (PSf) hollow-fiber membrane embedded with hydrophilic iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) for protein purification by means of ultrafiltration. Before membrane fabrication, the dispersion stability of the IONPs was enhanced by the addition of a stabilizer, namely, citric acid (CA). Next, PSf-IONP-CA nanocompo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mixed-matrix PSF membranes showed a higher % FRR than the pristine PSF membranes at 6.25 bars due to the presence of composite particles on the PSF matrix, as ZnO and GO enhance the antifouling activity of membranes [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Between the two mixed-matrix PSF membranes CP and MCP, MCP had an FRR of 0.78, which was higher than CP (0.57) at 6.25 bar due to the presence of iron oxide in the composite particles in addition to GO and ZnO; iron oxide enhanced the membrane’s hydrophilicity and antifouling activity [ 35 ]. The lower FRR of MCP, compared with CP, at a lower pressure value could be due to CP having a higher water flux than MCP at lower pressure levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixed-matrix PSF membranes showed a higher % FRR than the pristine PSF membranes at 6.25 bars due to the presence of composite particles on the PSF matrix, as ZnO and GO enhance the antifouling activity of membranes [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Between the two mixed-matrix PSF membranes CP and MCP, MCP had an FRR of 0.78, which was higher than CP (0.57) at 6.25 bar due to the presence of iron oxide in the composite particles in addition to GO and ZnO; iron oxide enhanced the membrane’s hydrophilicity and antifouling activity [ 35 ]. The lower FRR of MCP, compared with CP, at a lower pressure value could be due to CP having a higher water flux than MCP at lower pressure levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macrovoid formation was observed in cross‐sectional morphology of both SPEEK/TiZr and SPEEK/TiZn MMMs. This may be due to the addition of nano metal oxides, which has induced faster solvent and nonsolvent exchange rate (instantaneous demixing) during PES rigidification 31 . From the EDS mapping of the cross‐sectional micrographs, good dispersion of nanocomposites Ti‐Zr and Ti‐Zn is noticed in MMMs of TiZr (0.5 wt% TiZr/PES), TiZn (0.5 wt% TiZn/PES), SPEEK/TiZr, and SPEEK/TiZn.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-sectional morphology of the membrane with two opposing skin layers is significantly different from the typical asymmetric structure of dry−wet spun PSf-based membranes. 25,26 As shown in Figure 1a, the AC particles distributed in the porous matrix and no particle clusters were observed. To obtain DLHF membranes, another dope solution containing the optimized composition of PSf and PMMA was co-extruded on top of the first layer.…”
Section: Binary-batch Adsorption Systemmentioning
confidence: 91%