“…In addition to rapid removal of Tc and Cr, the amount of Fe released into the solution during the initial 0.08 h of reaction is only a small fraction (≤4%) of the available Fe in the system, suggesting that, (i) if more Fe(II) aq had been released, these ions have since oxidized and precipitated likely as Fe oxyhydroxides and (ii) reaction products are being formed (Supporting Information, Table S1). Following reduction of Cr(VI) and Tc(VII) (confirmed by XANES/EXAFS in later sections), several potential pathways are expected to contribute to their removal and stabilization, including Cr(III) and Tc(IV) incorporation into iron spinels (e.g., magnetite [Fe 3 O 4 ] and chromite [FeCr 2 O 4 ]), ,,− ,− iron oxyhydroxides (e.g., goethite [α-FeOOH] and feroxyhyte [δ-FeOOH]), ,,,,, or the formation of other oxide and hydroxide phases (e.g., TcO 2 · x H 2 O and Cr(OH) 3 ). ,,− However, formation of the final solid product is highly dependent on the simulant chemistry ,,− and the nature of the final product is critical to assessing the fate of Tc and Cr. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns collected from select solids after their reaction in Tc-free simulants were used to quantify the distribution of mineral phases and identify mineralogical differences as a function of simulant chemistry (Figure S1 and Table ).…”