Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra18832j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile fabrication and photoelectrochemical properties of a CuO nanorod photocathode with a ZnO nanobranch protective layer

Abstract: Photoelectrochemical properties of CuO/ZnO photoelectrodes fabricated with nanorod and film structures were investigated and the effect of surface morphology on their photoelectrochemical performance was discussed in detail.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for pure g-C 3 N 4 , no detectable increase for the photocurrent density was observed after the light was turned on. On the basis of Figure c, the maximum applied bias photon-to-current efficiency (η ABPE ) could be estimated on the basis of the following equation: where P is the incident light intensity (mW cm –2 ) and J ph is the measured photocurrent density at the applied bias potential (versus Ag/AgCl) (mA cm –2 ), while the minimum potential needed for water splitting equals 1.23 V thermodynamically. Hence, the maximum η ABPE values of g-C 3 N 4 and 3% CoP–CN were estimated to be 0.039 and 0.051%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for pure g-C 3 N 4 , no detectable increase for the photocurrent density was observed after the light was turned on. On the basis of Figure c, the maximum applied bias photon-to-current efficiency (η ABPE ) could be estimated on the basis of the following equation: where P is the incident light intensity (mW cm –2 ) and J ph is the measured photocurrent density at the applied bias potential (versus Ag/AgCl) (mA cm –2 ), while the minimum potential needed for water splitting equals 1.23 V thermodynamically. Hence, the maximum η ABPE values of g-C 3 N 4 and 3% CoP–CN were estimated to be 0.039 and 0.051%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prepare pristine CuO photoelectrodes with different morphologies, several efforts have been conducted. The CuO can be prepared in the form of nanoparticles, [ 190 ] nanoleaves, [ 105 ] nanorods, [ 191–194 ] nanosheets, [ 195 ] nanowires, [ 196–199 ] flower‐like, [ 185 ] and nanofibers. [ 200 ] Preparing pristine CuO photoelectrodes with high photocurrent response and stability is of great importance because applying this approach obviates the need for preparing hybrid or doped structures.…”
Section: Photoelectrochemical Properties Of Pure Cuomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CuO with a narrow bandgap of 1.3–1.7 eV can efficiently absorb visible light and generate high photocurrent. Especially for one-dimensional (1D) structures, CuO NWs and CuO nanorods (NRs) demonstrate more enhanced PEC performances than planar CuO. Compared with Cu 2 O, CuO photocathode is more stable, but photocorrosion is still a major factor limiting its application. The stability of CuO can be improved by various methods, such as metallic element doping and constructing heterojunctions.…”
Section: Photocathode-driven Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%