2018
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b09797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile Doping in Two-Dimensional Transition-Metal Dichalcogenides by UV Light

Abstract: Two-dimensional (2D) materials have been emerging as potential candidates for the next-generation materials in various technology fields. The performance of the devices based on these 2D materials depends on their intrinsic band structures as well as the extrinsic (doping) effects such as surrounding chemicals and environmental oxygen/moisture, which strongly determines their Fermi energy level. Herein, we report the UV treatments on the 2D transition-metal dichalcogenides, to controllably dope the samples wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such stable vdW surface oxidation can be clearly observed in 1L‐ReS 2 and 1L‐ReSe 2 , however absent in 1L‐MoS 2 and graphene with our experimental conditions, where the defects are involved. [ 21 ] In MoS 2 , the oxygen radicals could easily generate S vacancies instead of SO bonding formation. Our DFT result shows the S vacancy formation energy of 1L‐MoS 2 (−3.25 eV) is lower than that of 1L‐ReS 2 (−2.55 eV), thus more likely to form vacancies during UV treatment in 1L‐MoS 2 (see Figures S21 and S22, Supporting Information), precluding the similar vdW surface oxidation in MoS 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such stable vdW surface oxidation can be clearly observed in 1L‐ReS 2 and 1L‐ReSe 2 , however absent in 1L‐MoS 2 and graphene with our experimental conditions, where the defects are involved. [ 21 ] In MoS 2 , the oxygen radicals could easily generate S vacancies instead of SO bonding formation. Our DFT result shows the S vacancy formation energy of 1L‐MoS 2 (−3.25 eV) is lower than that of 1L‐ReS 2 (−2.55 eV), thus more likely to form vacancies during UV treatment in 1L‐MoS 2 (see Figures S21 and S22, Supporting Information), precluding the similar vdW surface oxidation in MoS 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike most irreversible doping effects produced by chemical methods or surface charge transfer doping, this photo‐induced doping phenomenon gradually recovered to its initial state within 10 min (Figure S3, Supporting Information). [ 33–36 ] Interestingly, it was found that the recovery process could be promoted by immersing the device in dry air, indicating the potential occurrence of photo‐induced adsorption and desorption of molecules, e.g., oxygen. [ 16,33 ] The extracted current variation ( I irradiation / I initial ) as a function of gate voltage shown in Figure 1e indicates a more distinct change under negative electrostatic gating, which is beneficial for exploration of the dynamic variation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, doping can occur via either direct substitution of atoms or via interstitial sites amidst atoms found within the crystal lattice or through intercalation amidst layers in layered TMDs ( Figure ). [ 28,29 ] Doping of TMDs can possibly enhance their electronic properties and the density of active sites, hence improving their catalytic activities. For instance, studies have reported that when TMDs are doped with metallic heteroatom, their differential free energy of hydrogen adsorption, Δ G H get altered and proton‐transfer kinetics were accelerated, which are beneficial for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%