2021
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.1c00795
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile Determination of COVID-19 Seroconversion via Nonradiative Energy Transfer

Abstract: Serological tests are crucial in a pandemic scenario, since they are a valuable tool to spot those citizens with potential immunity, specific regions with herd immunity or particular at-risk populations, as well as acquired immunity after vaccination. Hence, high-throughput, fast, cost-effective, and straightforward technologies facilitating interrogation of COVID-19 seroconversion are an existing need. Herein, we developed an innovative assay for the determination of COVID-19 seroconversion. Fluorophore-label… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection (Table ), g-FETs have a response time of ∼80 s in serum at 10 –15 M level, comparable to that of 3D-printed electrochemical test chip in PBS at the same level of concentration. The response time of g-FETs is <2 min upon 5 × 10 –18 ∼ 5 × 10 –12 M antibody, faster than paper-based electrochemical biosensor (30 min for 6.4 × 10 –12 M) and nonradiative energy transfer assay (42 min for 2 × 10 –14 M). The fast response is attributed to the large association rate ( K on ), which is calculated by where t 1 and t 2 are the time of adding the sample and after a while; Δ I % 1 and Δ I % 2 are |Δ I DS / I 0 | values at t 1 and t 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In terms of SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection (Table ), g-FETs have a response time of ∼80 s in serum at 10 –15 M level, comparable to that of 3D-printed electrochemical test chip in PBS at the same level of concentration. The response time of g-FETs is <2 min upon 5 × 10 –18 ∼ 5 × 10 –12 M antibody, faster than paper-based electrochemical biosensor (30 min for 6.4 × 10 –12 M) and nonradiative energy transfer assay (42 min for 2 × 10 –14 M). The fast response is attributed to the large association rate ( K on ), which is calculated by where t 1 and t 2 are the time of adding the sample and after a while; Δ I % 1 and Δ I % 2 are |Δ I DS / I 0 | values at t 1 and t 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The resulting quenching signals employed to calculate the kinetic constants were obtained following previous procedures. 14,17 with the real-time biosensing platform, particularly for the interaction between H-IgG and F-anti-H-IgG, which is included in the Supporting Information. The characteristic one-phase association curves were then plotted.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, unlike the SPR method in which instrumentation and sensor chips are expensive, our approach is relatively cost-effective as the assay is around 0.47 USD per test, at a laboratory scale. 17 Microplate readers are available in the market for approximately 28 000 USD (e.g., from Molecular Devices). We foresee a new generation of diagnostics based on our affordable protein kinetics analysis.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the use of aptamer-like recognition sensors based on CNs has been reported by several studies. Avila-Huerta et al constructed a novel FRET-based fluorescent sensor with FITC-labeled SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD recombinant protein (F-RBD) as a signal probe for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies detection [ 117 ]. F-RBD can emit an intense fluorescence upon SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection; however, the fluorescence of F-RBD can be quenched by GO in the absence of RBD antibody.…”
Section: Biosensing Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%