2022
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/rknu2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial Trustworthiness Perception Across the Adult Lifespan

Abstract: This paper adopted an adult lifespan developmental approach by asking 87 young (25-39 years), 59 middle-aged (44-59 years), and 47 older (60-78 years) women and men to rate the trustworthiness of faces that systematically varied in age (young, middle-aged, older) and emotion (neutral, happy, sad, fearful, angry, disgusted) from the FACES Lifespan Database.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation between the present study’s subjective face trustworthiness ratings and the face trustworthiness ratings (norm ratings) from Pehlivanoglu et al (2022) was high ( r = 0.72), supporting strong convergence across the two studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The correlation between the present study’s subjective face trustworthiness ratings and the face trustworthiness ratings (norm ratings) from Pehlivanoglu et al (2022) was high ( r = 0.72), supporting strong convergence across the two studies.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…https://psyarxiv.com/rknu2/4 The correlation between the present study's subjective face trustworthiness ratings and the face trustworthiness ratings (norm ratings) fromPehlivanoglu et al (2022) was high (r = 0.72), supporting strong convergence across the two studies.5 This approach allowed us to model both linear and quadratic effects of face trustworthiness on brain activity, while maintaining sufficient number of trials within each face trustworthiness level for robust estimation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations