1993
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880140069012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial Skeletal Augmentation Using Hydroxyapatite Cement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
127
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
127
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the CPC scaffold is advantageous over sintered hydroxyapatite implants, because CPC can self-harden in situ and conform to complex cavity shapes, while sintered hydroxyapatite requires machining which is difficult due to its brittleness. In addition, CPC can be resorbed and replaced by new bone [9,12,33], while sintered hydroxyapatite remains more stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the CPC scaffold is advantageous over sintered hydroxyapatite implants, because CPC can self-harden in situ and conform to complex cavity shapes, while sintered hydroxyapatite requires machining which is difficult due to its brittleness. In addition, CPC can be resorbed and replaced by new bone [9,12,33], while sintered hydroxyapatite remains more stable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36][37][38][39] CPC is comprised of a mixture of tetracalcium phosphate [TTCP: Ca 4 (PO 4 ) 2 O] and dicalcium phosphate anhydrous (DCPA: CaHPO 4 ), which forms resorbable HA. 36,40,41 Due to its excellent osteoconductivity, CPC was approved in 1996 by the Food and Drug Administration for repairing craniofacial defects, thus becoming the first CPC available for clinical use. 40 However, the brittleness of CPC limits its use to only nonload-bearing areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it may be used in the sinus region for facial augmentation [127,562] and the formulation can be supported by metal hardware [127]. In dogs, BoneSource TM was employed to supplement the supraorbital ridge and to augment skull base defects [563]. Another group performed trials to ascertain the inflammation around the site and the degree of loss of the implanted BoneSource TM .…”
Section: Oral Maxillofacial and Craniofacial Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%