Facial Scanning Accuracy with Stereophotogrammetry and Smartphone Technology in Children: A Systematic Review

Abstract

The aim of the study was to systematically review and compare the accuracy of smartphone scanners versus stereophotogrammetry technology for facial digitization in children. A systematic literature search strategy of articles published from 1 January 2010 to 30 August 2022 was adopted through a combination of Mesh terms and free text words pooled through boolean operators on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and OpenGrey. Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. Stationary stereophotogrammetry devices showed a mean accuracy that ranged from 0.087 to 0.860 mm, portable stereophotogrammetry scanners from 0.150 to 0.849 mm, and smartphones from 0.460 to 1.400 mm. Regarding the risk of bias assessment, fourteen papers showed an overall low risk, three articles had unclear risk and four articles had high risk. Although smartphones showed less performance on deep and irregular surfaces, all the analyzed devices were sufficiently accurate for clinical application. Internal depth-sensing cameras or external infrared structured-light depth-sensing cameras plugged into smartphones/tablets increased the accuracy. These devices are portable and inexpensive but require greater operator experience and patient compliance for the incremented time of acquisition. Stationary stereophotogrammetry is the gold standard for greater accuracy and shorter acquisition time, avoiding motion artifacts.

Smartphone-Based Facial Scanning as a Viable Tool for Facially Driven Orthodontics?

“…In a recent study of D’Ettorre et al in 2022 [ 45 ], the surface-to-surface deviation analysis between Bellus3D and 3dMD(stereophotogrammetry) showed an overlap percentage of 80.01% ± 5.92% within the range of 1 mm discrepancy. A recent systematic review paper focusing on stereophotogrammetry and smartphone technology by Quinzi et al, 2022, concluded that “Stationary stereophotogrammetry devices showed a mean accuracy that ranged from 0.087 to 0.860 mm, portable stereophotogrammetry scanners from 0.150 to 0.849 mm, and smartphones from 0.460 to 1.400 mm.” [ 46 ]. The volumetric estimation errors are typically bigger in smartphone scanning than in photogrammetry [ 47 ].…”

“Utility of Smartphone-based Three-dimensional Surface Imaging for Digital Facial Anthropometry”

“… 19 Previous studies have proved its effectiveness in capturing the face, making it valuable for surgical planning and evaluation in maxillofacial surgery. 18 , 20 The Vectra M5 comes with the software VAM for SM analysis. 21 The software allows anthropometric measurements.…”

Smile Reanimation with Masseteric-to-Facial Nerve Transfer plus Cross-Face Nerve Grafting in Patients with Segmental Midface Paresis: 3D Retrospective Quantitative Evaluation

“…From this point of view, patients have to move to a dedicated motion analysis laboratory with a specific set of instruments that can detect and reproduce movements in three dimensions [28]. Currently, most analyses are performed in two dimensions [22], but some ongoing investigations aim to use simplified, portable, low-cost instruments such as smartphones to record threedimensional data [47]. This new technology may improve the quantitative analysis of patients with facial palsy.…”