2011
DOI: 10.1177/000348941112000408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial Nerve Dehiscence and Cholesteatoma

Abstract: Dehiscence of the facial nerve was found in 27.1% of patients with cholesteatoma, with a significant difference between patients of pediatric and adult ages. A dehiscent facial nerve was more commonly seen during revision surgery and more frequent in patients older than 16 years. The site of dehiscence most frequently involved by cholesteatoma was the tympanic segment. The presence of a semicircular canal fistula increases the risk of facial nerve dehiscence. Finally, the results of preoperative CT scans are e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
27
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This is much less than incidence seen by Magliulo et al (2011), [41] in their study where it was 27%. Their sensitivity and specificity were 69% and 87% respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…This is much less than incidence seen by Magliulo et al (2011), [41] in their study where it was 27%. Their sensitivity and specificity were 69% and 87% respectively.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Where as CT showed facial canal dehiscence in only 0.12 % patients. This is much less than incidence seen by Magliulo et al [17] in their study where it was 27 %.…”
Section: Facial Canal Dehiscencecontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…It can coexist with FND, may be due to the proximity to facial nerve, as described in previous studies. [14][15][16][17] In our study also, a statistically significant positive association was noticed between facial canal dehiscence and presence of lateral semicircular canal fistula.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…The incidence of facial canal dehiscence has been estimated in several studies ranging from 3% to 40%. [14][15][16][17] In our study the incidence of FND was 17.5%, mostly affecting the tympanic segment and one patient had iatrogenic facial injury which required re-exploration. High resolution computer tomography of temporal bone can be used to alert the surgeon to potential intraoperative dangers and complication associated with the particular surgery.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%