2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2919169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial Image Inpainting With Deep Generative Model and Patch Search Using Region Weight

Abstract: Facial image inpainting is a challenging task because the missing region needs to be filled by the new pixels with semantic information (e.g., noses and mouths). The traditional methods that involve searching for similar patches are mature but it is not suitable for semantic inpainting. Recently, the deep generative model-based methods have been able to implement semantic image inpainting although inpainting results are blurry or distorted. In this paper, through analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For quantitative comparisons, facial inpainting works report results using L1 error, PSNR, SSIM [36], and inception score [31] in general. However, many works [7,18,37] mention that there are no good evaluation metrics due to many possible solutions different from the original image content. These metrics generate scores based on the similarity of the produced results to the original image.…”
Section: Model Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For quantitative comparisons, facial inpainting works report results using L1 error, PSNR, SSIM [36], and inception score [31] in general. However, many works [7,18,37] mention that there are no good evaluation metrics due to many possible solutions different from the original image content. These metrics generate scores based on the similarity of the produced results to the original image.…”
Section: Model Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When implementing DRS, we follow the setting in [14] and set γ dynamically for each batch of fake samples drawn from the GAN to the 95-th percentile of the F (x) in Eq. (7) for each x in this batch. We also keep training the discriminator on the validation set for another 20 epochs to further improve DRS's performance.…”
Section: A Mixture Of 25 2-d Gaussiansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…G ENERATIVE ADVERSARIAL NETWORKS (GANs) first introduced by [1] are well-known and powerful generative models for image synthesis and have been applied to various types of image-related tasks [2,3,4,5,6,7]. The vanilla GANs proposed by [1] consist of two neural networks: a generator and a discriminator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feature distribution dataset learned by a neural network is more suitable for facial image restoration with a large missing area and random damage. Not only are the texture details accurate but also are the contours harmonized, and the facial image conforms to the contextual semantics (Wei et al, 2019 ). After ongoing in-depth research by relevant scholars, deep learning-based image repair methods have produced a number of results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%