2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial growth changes in a Colombian Mestizo population: An 18-year follow-up longitudinal study using linear mixed models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding cephalometric findings, variations in the growth rhythm were observed, with stages of apparent activity and inactivity as well as important age-related changes, what coincides with a Colombian study in mestizo individuals without clefts (Jiménez et al, 2020) and the changes can be explained given the multiple differential development processes interacting at different growth stages, scales, and dimensions (Larson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Regarding cephalometric findings, variations in the growth rhythm were observed, with stages of apparent activity and inactivity as well as important age-related changes, what coincides with a Colombian study in mestizo individuals without clefts (Jiménez et al, 2020) and the changes can be explained given the multiple differential development processes interacting at different growth stages, scales, and dimensions (Larson et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…18 When evaluating the mandibular plane angle (Go-Me) with the (S-N) plane, a peak in values can be observed between the ages of 11 and 12 years, which may be due to the reduced number of cases evaluated at this age, and mainly occurs in patients with increased AFH; this is different from the behavior of this measure in the general population, in which it decreases over the course of life. 19 The maxillomandibular measurements evaluated in the anteroposterior plane show the same growth tendency in maxilla and mandible between the ages of 6 and 12 years, with no growth peaks, unlike other studies that do report peaks. This can be explained because of sample size or the methodology of cross-sectional studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…This part of the mandible responds to growth changes in other areas such as the condyle and hence a very steady growth. 4,14 The skull base in the studied population is smaller in size compared to other populations, 4,6,9,10,19 showing the most similarities with the Guatemalan sample. 12 This should be considered when making sagittal diagnoses using the skull base as a reference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three studies observed a significant increase in the anterior cranial base length (S-N) and posterior cranial base length (S-Ba) (Figure 2) in both sexes from childhood to young adulthood, [27][28][29] while two others showed the same trend, with no statistical analysis. 2,30 Longer S-N was generally observed in males than females in longitudinal 2,28,30 and cross-sectional study designs. 29,[31][32][33][34][35] Stahl de Castrillon et al 30 recorded longer S-N in males at 6, 16, and 17 years.…”
Section: Cranial Basementioning
confidence: 96%