2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial expressions and complex IAPS pictures: Common and differential networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
221
3
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
35
221
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, several studies using masked fearful faces did report amygdala activation (eg, Carlson et al, 2009). Consciously perceived faces appear to evoke somewhat stronger amygdala activation than complex aversive IAPS pictures, even though the latter are rated as more arousing (Britton et al, 2006). Faces are less complex than aversive pictures, which may facilitate masked presentations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, several studies using masked fearful faces did report amygdala activation (eg, Carlson et al, 2009). Consciously perceived faces appear to evoke somewhat stronger amygdala activation than complex aversive IAPS pictures, even though the latter are rated as more arousing (Britton et al, 2006). Faces are less complex than aversive pictures, which may facilitate masked presentations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faces activate similar brain circuitry as emotional scenes and seem to activate it even more strongly (Britton et al, 2006;Hariri et al, 2002). Emotional faces and scenes have also been shown to be perceived preferentially, e.g., in binocular rivalry (Alpers and Gerdes, 2007;Alpers and Pauli, 2006) and they both strongly lead to attentional engagement Mogg and Bradley, 2002).…”
Section: Emotional Input Versus Emotional Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent experiments (Britton et al, 2006;Hariri et al, 2002) demonstrated within the same experimental paradigm that emotional scenes and faces activate similar brain structures, including those directly engaged in emotion processing like the amygdala. However, faces were superior in eliciting stronger activations in the amygdala (Hariri et al, 2002) or activations in more extended regions beyond it (Britton et al, 2006). In spite of the similarities in brain activations, it is not resolved, whether this reflects the decoding of emotional cues or whether it also corresponds with comparable physiological output.…”
Section: Emotional Facial Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavioural data suggest that the key skills impaired in individuals with a family history of MDD are emotion processing [12][13][14] and attention shifting from emotional content, 15,16 neural correlates of which have been previously verified in healthy individuals. [17][18][19] These 2 processes are crucial components of emotional regulation 20,21 and represent its 2 basic functions: an ability to explore emotional meaning of the environment and a potential to withdraw from the exploration in accordance with one's goals. The disturbance of emotional regulation is, according to some models, [22][23][24][25][26][27] a key feature of MDD and involves interplay of cognitive and emotional functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, examining neural correlates in these comparison groups is of high clinical relevance and seems to be crucial for targeting vulnerable individuals and developing strategies for prevention of depression. We assumed that the HC-FHP group experienced alterations in neural activation in the areas associated with emotion processing and attention switching in healthy controls (e.g., frontal and cingulate gyri, parietal cortex, insula, premotor cortex, subcortical areas [17][18][19]34 ). We hypothesized that the HC-FHP group had elevated neural activation relative to the MDD-FHP group in frontal, premotor and parietal areas as markers for relative resilience and elevated activation compared with the HC-FHN group in the cingulate cortex and subcortical areas based on our previous study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%