2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-021-11525-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial expression synthesis based on similar faces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, GMM‐score (Harshavardha et al, 2022) evaluates the generated images based on a package of different criteria, including inter‐class and intra‐class diversity, sample quality, and other metrics like precision, recall, and F1 score. Also, Testa et al (2021) proposed an evaluation metric to evaluate the quality of the synthesized facial images by comparing the common areas of the facial features in the generated and reference facial images. Also, the comprehensive contour index metric (CCIM; B. Zhang, Gu, et al, 2022) was proposed as an evaluation metric for blurred and low illumination image reconstruction tasks.…”
Section: Gan Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, GMM‐score (Harshavardha et al, 2022) evaluates the generated images based on a package of different criteria, including inter‐class and intra‐class diversity, sample quality, and other metrics like precision, recall, and F1 score. Also, Testa et al (2021) proposed an evaluation metric to evaluate the quality of the synthesized facial images by comparing the common areas of the facial features in the generated and reference facial images. Also, the comprehensive contour index metric (CCIM; B. Zhang, Gu, et al, 2022) was proposed as an evaluation metric for blurred and low illumination image reconstruction tasks.…”
Section: Gan Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%