2015
DOI: 10.5121/ijcses.2015.6201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial Expression Recognition Based on Edge Detection

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the JAFFE database, the leave-one-out test result obtained surpassed the LDA + SVM [4] model by 1%, whereas the model that uses the same extraction and classification techniques with HOG and SVM [5] produced results that were less than those of the proposed model by 2.41%. The results of the K-fold tests also surpassed those of the previous models, especially the 10-fold model that had a huge accuracy difference of 5.70%.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the JAFFE database, the leave-one-out test result obtained surpassed the LDA + SVM [4] model by 1%, whereas the model that uses the same extraction and classification techniques with HOG and SVM [5] produced results that were less than those of the proposed model by 2.41%. The results of the K-fold tests also surpassed those of the previous models, especially the 10-fold model that had a huge accuracy difference of 5.70%.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some researchers decided to segment the face rather than take it as a whole and changed their extraction method. Chen et al [5] applied facial segmentation to separate the eyes and mouth from the face before applying the histogram-oriented gradients (HOG) feature and classifying the image using an SVM. Also, Chen et al [5] used a patch-based Gabor filter after segmenting each component of the face.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mainly two steps, namely, feature extraction and classification, are associated with the FER task. Conventional features, such as Gobar wavelets [4], curves [12], scale-invariant feature transform [21], HOG [8], LBP [6], minutiae points [11], Haar wavelet [5], HBIV [9], DBN [10], and edges [38], were exploited with advanced domain comprehension in the first step. In the second step, support vector machine (SVM) [39], feedforward neural network [40], and extreme learning machine [41] were adopted for classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researcher described edge detection algorithms for eyes and lips variation during human communication. canny edge detection (CED) provides better results on following facial expressions such as Sad 91.33%, Smile 99.44%, and Surprise 95.71% [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%