1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00003-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial expression megamix: Tests of dimensional and category accounts of emotion recognition

Abstract: We report four experiments investigating the perception of photographic quality continua of interpolated ('morphed') facial expressions derived from prototypes of the 6 emotions in the Ekman and Friesen (1976) series (happiness, surprise, fear, sadness, disgust and anger). In Experiment 1, morphed images made from all possible pairwise combinations of expressions were presented in random order; subjects identified these as belonging to distinct expression categories corresponding to the prototypes at each end … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
447
3
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 516 publications
(492 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
36
447
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The first task was the Morphed Facial Expression Task (mFER), which employs standardized faces taken from the Pictures of Facial Affect set (Ekman and Friesen, 1976), morphed by 10% increments between 0% emotional expression (ie, a neutral face) and 100% emotional expression (Young et al, 1997). The version of the task includes four basic emotions (ie, anger, fear, happiness, and sadness).…”
Section: Behavioral Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first task was the Morphed Facial Expression Task (mFER), which employs standardized faces taken from the Pictures of Facial Affect set (Ekman and Friesen, 1976), morphed by 10% increments between 0% emotional expression (ie, a neutral face) and 100% emotional expression (Young et al, 1997). The version of the task includes four basic emotions (ie, anger, fear, happiness, and sadness).…”
Section: Behavioral Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pictures (from Ekman and Friesen 1976) were morphed from neutral to 100% expressions (Young et al 1997) in 10% stages, producing 10 intensities for each emotion.…”
Section: Facial Expression Recognition Task (Fert)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show that facial expressions that differ in perceived emotion are discriminated more easily than facial expressions that are perceived to convey the same emotion. This finding is widely considered to form the strongest test for behavioral evidence of categorical perception (12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Evidence for categorical perception of expression is shown by the consistency with which the basic emotions are recognized (7) and the greater sensitivity to changes in facial expression that alter the perceived emotion (8, 9). In contrast, continuous or dimensional models are better able to explain the systematic confusions that occur when labeling facial expressions (2) and can account for variation in the way that basic emotions are expressed (10) and the fact that we are readily able to perceive differences in intensity of a given emotional expression (11,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%