2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-60832013000400001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial emotional recognition in schizophrenia: preliminary results of the virtual reality program for facial emotional recognition

Abstract: Background: Significant deficits in emotional recognition and social perception characterize patients with schizophrenia and have direct negative impact both in inter-personal relationships and in social functioning. Virtual reality, as a methodological resource, might have a high potential for assessment and training skills in people suffering from mental illness. Objectives: To present preliminary results of a facial emotional recognition assessment designed for patients with schizophrenia, using 3D avatars … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
21
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results can be quite different between emotion-processing studies using different types of stimuli. For example, in contrast with previous findings using static images of emotional faces, Souto et al (2012) found no differences between a group of adults with schizophrenia and healthy controls on an emotion-recognition task using dynamic stimuli. On the other hand, a study by Speer et al (2007) in autism shows differences between dynamic and static facial processing, with autistic individuals looking less at the eyes during dynamic stimuli.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results can be quite different between emotion-processing studies using different types of stimuli. For example, in contrast with previous findings using static images of emotional faces, Souto et al (2012) found no differences between a group of adults with schizophrenia and healthy controls on an emotion-recognition task using dynamic stimuli. On the other hand, a study by Speer et al (2007) in autism shows differences between dynamic and static facial processing, with autistic individuals looking less at the eyes during dynamic stimuli.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we expressly designed this emotion-recognition task so that individuals with 22q11DS could perform similarly to controls, which allowed us to compare visual scanning of emotions in two groups who both performed well on the task. We expected that the ecological validity of our stimuli would enable participants with 22q11DS to perform well on the task, as was shown by Souto et al (2012) in patients with schizophrenia. Moreover, per Kohler et al (2003), we expected individuals with 22q11DS to recognise emotions when they were further on in the dynamic films and the faces presented were higher in intensity with more exaggerated expressions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Notwithstanding this however, all studies found that patients had a decreased ability to correctly identify the emotion expressed in dynamic faces compared to controls. This deficit in emotion recognition was also apparent in relatives of patients [61], and in healthy individuals possessing schizotypal traits [1]. In addition, functional neuroimaging research from our lab has shown that patients with schizophrenia show altered activity of brain regions involved in emotion processing while viewing dynamic facial expressions compared to healthy controls, which may contribute towards some of these deficits [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Despite this, only a handful of behavioural studies have been conducted to date involving patients with SZ, in which facial emotion-processing accuracy to dynamic facial emotion stimuli was assessed [3,6,53,31,46,8,61]. The validity of both the Archer and Russell studies as measurements of patient accuracy during dynamic face emotion recognition tasks has been questioned [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation