2020
DOI: 10.4108/eai.30-10-2018.165702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial emotion recognition via stationary wavelet entropy and Biogeography-based optimization

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: As one of the important research directions in the field of computer vision, facial emotion recognition plays an important role in people's daily life. How to make the computer accurately read facial emotion is an important research content. OBJECTIVES: In the current research on facial emotion recognition, there are some problems such as poor generalization ability of network model and low robustness of recognition system. To solve above problems, we propose a novel facial emotion recognition me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The state-of-art methods are HWT [9], CSO [10], and BBO [42], and the corresponding OA is 78.37+1.50%, 89.49+0.76%, and 93.79+1.24% respectively. The result of comparison is shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state-of-art methods are HWT [9], CSO [10], and BBO [42], and the corresponding OA is 78.37+1.50%, 89.49+0.76%, and 93.79+1.24% respectively. The result of comparison is shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sensitivity and overall accuracy (OA) of the network after the implement of r=10,g=10, we can obtain the following formula to define: 8) is the confusion matrix, is the number of iteratio ns, and is the number of groups.…”
Section: Figure 7 Residual Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment, the OA of "ResNet-101" combined with transfer learning method was compared with that of PCA + SVM [3], HOS [4], CSO [7] and BBO [8]. The results were shown in Table 3 and Figure 12: the OA of PCA + SVM [3] was 89.14±2.91%, the OA of HOS [4] was 83.43±2.15%, the OA of CSO [7] was 89.49±0.76%, and the OA of BBO [8] was 93.79±1.24%.We can clearly see that the accuracy of "ResNet-101" combined with transfer learning method is the highest (96.29±0.78%), followed by BBO [8], CSO [7], PCA + SVM [3]. It can be seen from Table 3 that the "ResNet-101" method obtains the highest OA mainly depends on: the existence of ResNet-101 residual module solves the problem of network degradation; In the process of deep learning exploration, it is found that the expansion of depth is far better than the expansion of breadth.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations