2017
DOI: 10.1080/13546805.2017.1330190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facial and prosodic emotion recognition in social anxiety disorder

Abstract: These findings may represent a cross-modality pattern of avoidance in the later stage of identifying negative emotions in SAD. This pattern may be linked to clinical symptom severity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, alexithymia -a personality trait that is characterised by difficulties identifying and labelling one's subjective feelings, problems in differentiating bodily sensations and feelings, and a tendency to focus on external, as opposed to internal, experiences (Taylor, Bagby & Parker, 1991) -is associated with poorer facial emotion recognition (Lane, Hsu, Locke, Ritenbaugh & Stonnington, 2015), possibly due to reduced imitation of facial expressions (Sonnby-Borgström, 2009). Likewise, in patients with anxiety and/or depression, deficits in facial affect recognition (e.g., Gollan, McCloskey, Hoxha, & Coccaro, 2010;Tseng et al, 2017) as well as biases towards negative evaluations of emotional information (e.g., Bradley, Mogg, Falla, & Hamilton, 2010) have been reported. Such deficits were mediated by emotion intensity (improved accuracy for higher-intensity emotions) as well as the degree of symptomatology, i.e., increase in depressive symptoms resulted in increased recognition accuracy for sad faces, but decreased accuracy for other emotions (Gollan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, alexithymia -a personality trait that is characterised by difficulties identifying and labelling one's subjective feelings, problems in differentiating bodily sensations and feelings, and a tendency to focus on external, as opposed to internal, experiences (Taylor, Bagby & Parker, 1991) -is associated with poorer facial emotion recognition (Lane, Hsu, Locke, Ritenbaugh & Stonnington, 2015), possibly due to reduced imitation of facial expressions (Sonnby-Borgström, 2009). Likewise, in patients with anxiety and/or depression, deficits in facial affect recognition (e.g., Gollan, McCloskey, Hoxha, & Coccaro, 2010;Tseng et al, 2017) as well as biases towards negative evaluations of emotional information (e.g., Bradley, Mogg, Falla, & Hamilton, 2010) have been reported. Such deficits were mediated by emotion intensity (improved accuracy for higher-intensity emotions) as well as the degree of symptomatology, i.e., increase in depressive symptoms resulted in increased recognition accuracy for sad faces, but decreased accuracy for other emotions (Gollan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASD is often comorbid with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, and anxiety. Previous studies have discovered that ADHD [2,27], depression [2,28], and anxiety [2,29] may be risk factors of bullying involvement and facial emotion misrecognition. In addition, sociodemographic data, such as sex [30] and age [31,32], are often considered relevant to bullying involvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a 2001 literature review acknowledged the paucity of work in this domain (Heinrichs & Hofmann, 2001). Since then, three studies have attempted to address this gap (Peschard & Philippot, 2017;Quadflieg et al, 2007;Tseng et al, 2017). One study found that those who scored high on a social anxiety self-report measure were more likely to label neutral vocal stimuli with negative emotions, showing a negativity bias compared to their less-anxious peers (Peschard & Philippot, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study found that those who scored high on a social anxiety self-report measure were more likely to label neutral vocal stimuli with negative emotions, showing a negativity bias compared to their less-anxious peers (Peschard & Philippot, 2017). Another found that those with SAD took longer to classify fearful vocal stimuli (Tseng et al, 2017). In a paradigm most similar to the current study, Quadflieg et al (2007) found that those with SAD correctly recognized more sad and fearful voices and fewer happy voices than controls, yet there were no between-group differences in the identification of neutral, disgust, and angry prosody or in ratings of stimuli intensity in this small sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%