2018
DOI: 10.1080/07370024.2017.1421954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facets of Website Content

Abstract: Content is of primary importance in the World Wide Web. In particular, subjective perceptions of content are known to influence a variety of user evaluations thereby altering attitudes and behavioral outcomes. Thus, it is essential that individually experienced facets of content can be adequately assessed. In a series of seven studies we create, validate, and benchmark a measure for users' subjective view on web content. In the first six studies, a total of 3,106 participants evaluated a sum of 60 websites. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scales for website evaluation were the same as in Study 3 of Thielsch, Blotenberg & Jaron (2014) —except for content, here a revised version of the according questionnaire was used (see Thielsch & Hirschfeld, in press ). All subjective website evaluation scales were rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from “1—strongly disagree” to “7 –strongly agree”.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scales for website evaluation were the same as in Study 3 of Thielsch, Blotenberg & Jaron (2014) —except for content, here a revised version of the according questionnaire was used (see Thielsch & Hirschfeld, in press ). All subjective website evaluation scales were rated on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from “1—strongly disagree” to “7 –strongly agree”.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, this interaction between website and web user has become an important field of research. Thus, the evaluation of websites and their features has been intensively investigated (for overviews see Thielsch & Hirschfeld, in press ; Hornbæk, 2006 ; Moshagen & Thielsch, 2010 ). However, specific user features might also influence evaluation outcomes and therefore likewise be of interest for human–computer interaction research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, with respect to the most relevant predictors, we can recommend the scale of McKnight et al (2011) to investigate Reliability . For measuring Credibility , we suggest the corresponding scale of the Web-CLIC (Thielsch & Hirschfeld, in press) or an adoption of the message credibility scale of Appelman & Sundar (2016). Such scales are short enough to be enclosed in employee surveys or other monitoring studies targeted at the IT infrastructure of an organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As information quality measures, we adapted scales measuring appropriate Amount , Security , and Relevance from the AIMQ (Lee et al, 2002) as well as the Clarity , Credibility , and Informativeness scales from the Web-CLIC (Thielsch & Hirschfeld, in press). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The architecture of the ICSS is shown in Figure 1 below. Sustainability 2018, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 15 and has been verified in the online context, it was developed in an end computer context and remains limited in its ability to measure the communication characters of a virtual community [37,38]. Therefore, the study investigated the precise composition of user satisfaction and community building [39,40] to evaluate teachers' satisfaction with the ICSS.…”
Section: The Architecture Of the Icssmentioning
confidence: 99%