Facets of the NEO-PI-R and smoking cessation

Río, Elena Fernández del; López‐Durán, Ana; Rodríguez‐Cano, Rubén; Martínez, Úrsula Faura; Martínez-Vispo, Carmela; Becoña, Elisardo

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.030

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Observations that different facets of the same FFM trait had very different and sometimes even opposing outcome associations or that the apparent associations were driven by only a few facets of the trait have also been reported for other outcomes. Some relevant examples include job performance (Judge et al, 2013;Tett, Steele, & Beauregard, 2003), antisocial behaviour (Corff & Toupin, 2009), dietary habits (Mõttus et al, 2012b), smoking cessation (Fernández del Río et al, 2015), consumer behaviour (Otero-López & Villardefrancos Pol, 2013), sexually transmitted disease (Mõttus, Realo, Allik, Esko, & Metspalu, 2012c), relationship status and quality (Noftle & Shaver, 2006) and life satisfaction (Marrero Quevedo & Carballeira Abella, 2011). It may well be that in many, if not most, instances, the variability in outcome associations is due to variability in factor loadings, but this needs to be tested.…”

Section: Existing Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

Towards More Rigorous Personality Trait–Outcome Research

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Much of personality research attempts to identify causal links between personality traits and various types of outcomes. I argue that causal interpretations require traits to be seen as existentially and holistically real and the associations to be independent of specific ways of operationalizing the traits. Among other things, this means that, to the extents that causality is to be ascribed to such holistic traits, items and facets of those traits should be similarly associated with specific outcomes, except for variability in the degrees to which they reflect the traits (i.e. factor loadings). I argue that, before drawing causal inferences about personality trait–outcome associations, the presence of this condition should be routinely tested by, for example, systematically comparing the outcome associations of individual items or facets, or sampling different indicators for measuring the same purported traits. Existing evidence suggests that observed associations between personality traits and outcomes at least sometimes depend on which particular items or facets have been included in trait operationalizations, calling trait‐level causal interpretations into question. However, this has rarely been considered in the literature. I argue that when outcome associations are specific to facets, they should not be generalized to traits. Furthermore, when the associations are specific to particular items, they should not even be generalized to facets. Copyright © 2016 European Association of Personality Psychology

show abstract

Section: Existing Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

Towards More Rigorous Personality Trait–Outcome Research

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The publications show that gender roles number among the psychosocial factors associated with drug and alcohol consumption: Role acceptance favors alcohol consumption in the case of the masculine role and provides protection from alcohol consumption in the case of feminine roles (Zimmermann et al, 2010). Tobacco consumption, a behavior that affects health negatively the world over, is associated with emotional processes, personality variables (Fernández Del Río et al, 2015), thrill seeking (Fernández-Artamendi et al, 2016) and anxiety (Becoña et al, 2002) among other factors.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contribution of Social Psychology Research to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Spanish Publications

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study analyses the publications by Spanish institutions indexed by the Web of Science in the thematic category of “Psychology, Social”. The objectives are to determine whether such publications address topics related to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and to what extent the research conducted contributes to achieving the goals proposed in each of the SDGs. Publications were classified by their relationship with the SDGs using OSDG tool, and an in-depth content analysis was performed to validate the results. A corpus of 1,632 papers published by Spanish institutions was identified. The results show that 34% percent of the papers address matters related to the SDGs; 23% of these are related to Goal 3 (good health and well-being), and 5%, to Goal 5 (gender equality). For achieving SDG 3 goals, the reviewed papers evidence the need that institutions, governments and society to provide, especially for children and adolescents, healthy social environments to prevent harmful social relationships while improving individual skills to manage emotions in everyday life and promoting cultural integration. Regarding SDG 5, it should be a priority the application of effective strategies to change stereotypes, assigned sexual roles and sexist attitudes that sustain inequality and violence against women.

show abstract