2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10745-019-00109-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faces in the Wilderness: a New Network of Crossdated Culturally-Modified Red Pine in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness of Northern Minnesota, USA

Abstract: New dates from culturally modified red pine rediscovered in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in northern Minnesota provide an opportunity to merge tree-ring records of human land use with archaeological records, historical travel accounts, and traditional knowledge to enhance understanding of Anishinaabeg land tenure in the Wilderness. Records from 244 culturally modified trees (CMTs) demonstrate varying intensities of human use along historical water routes, notably the Border Route that connected Gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tree-ring analysis of a cluster of CMTs on an island in Lake Saganaga placed the dates of modification squarely within a known period of Anishinaabe land use (Johnson et al 2018). Subsequent work established a network of 246 CMTs located across the BWCAW that contained 308 individual peel scars, of which 159 scars on 136 trees were absolutely dated ( Figure 3A; Larson et al 2019). The earliest inner date of samples collected in this effort was 1589, and the earliest peel scar documented was on a red pine trunk modified in 1743, only seven years after the earliest European American documentation of an Anishinaabe community along the western border of the study area (Burpee 1968).…”
Section: Methods and Results: A Revised History Of Fire In The Bwcawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tree-ring analysis of a cluster of CMTs on an island in Lake Saganaga placed the dates of modification squarely within a known period of Anishinaabe land use (Johnson et al 2018). Subsequent work established a network of 246 CMTs located across the BWCAW that contained 308 individual peel scars, of which 159 scars on 136 trees were absolutely dated ( Figure 3A; Larson et al 2019). The earliest inner date of samples collected in this effort was 1589, and the earliest peel scar documented was on a red pine trunk modified in 1743, only seven years after the earliest European American documentation of an Anishinaabe community along the western border of the study area (Burpee 1968).…”
Section: Methods and Results: A Revised History Of Fire In The Bwcawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of peels were created during the 1700s and 1800s, the period of highest fire frequency documented in the BWCAW ( Figure 3C), and the spatial distribution of the CMTs clearly aligns with the Border Route, one of the primary travel and trade corridors used by Anishinaabe communities and European American fur traders, especially during the North West Company era from 1780 to 1802 ( Figure 3A). The CMT data provided direct evidence of human land use in the BWCAW at specific sites and during specific times when fire occurred more frequently than at any other time during the past 400 years (Larson et al 2019). A peel scar on a culturally modified tree, with the inset showing tool marks associated with the creation of a peel scar that dated to the early growing season of 1790.…”
Section: Methods and Results: A Revised History Of Fire In The Bwcawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the close spatial association of frequent fire sites in the BWCAW to CMTs (Larson et al. 2019), represents the clear association of both fire scars and CMTs with areas of traditional Indigenous use that were off the Border Route (Larson et al. 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2018, Larson et al. 2019, 2021) These were differentiated from fire‐scar injuries by characteristic tool marks (e.g., axe cuts, patterned scrapings), location on the tree bole, and overall shape. We collected samples from these CMTs where wilderness regulations allowed and, with permission from Anishinaabe Knowledge Keepers, appointed tribal community representatives, and U.S. Forest Service Cultural Resource specialists.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using dendrochronological methods on them, CMTs can not only provide temporal precision (Andersson 2005;Rautio et al 2014), but also precise information about human movement within forests and also the use of specific forest resources, notably the utilization of tree bark for construction and household items (Steward 1984), or the use of inner-bark as an important food source (Prince 2001;Rautio et al 2014). Accordingly, linking historical and archaeological information with analysis of CMTs and historic forest structure is one possible road forward to getting a broader picture of the habitation and resource use of indigenous peoples in the past (Josefsson et al 2010;Heffner and Heffner 2012;Rautio et al 2014;Larson et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%