2006
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies.

Abstract: Faces are perceived holistically, a phenomenon best illustrated when the processing of a face feature is affected by the other features. Here, the authors tested the hypothesis that the holistic perception of a face mainly relies on its low spatial frequencies. Holistic face perception was tested in two classical paradigms: the whole-part advantage (Experiment 1) and the composite face effect (Experiments 2-4). Holistic effects were equally large or larger for low-pass filtered faces as compared to full-spectr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
364
4
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(398 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(227 reference statements)
28
364
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a large body of work suggesting that many aspects of face processing may occur holistically, rather than at the level of components or individual features (de Heering, Houthuys, & Rossion, 2006;Goffaux & Rossion, 2006;Singer & Sheinberg, 2006;Tanaka, Kay, Grinnell, Stansfield, & Szechter, 1998;Yovel & Duchaine, 2006). The lack of an aftereffect in the Quartered-Face/Mixed-Expression condition of Experiment 1 is consistent with this view.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a large body of work suggesting that many aspects of face processing may occur holistically, rather than at the level of components or individual features (de Heering, Houthuys, & Rossion, 2006;Goffaux & Rossion, 2006;Singer & Sheinberg, 2006;Tanaka, Kay, Grinnell, Stansfield, & Szechter, 1998;Yovel & Duchaine, 2006). The lack of an aftereffect in the Quartered-Face/Mixed-Expression condition of Experiment 1 is consistent with this view.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…While facial features can clearly be recognized and exist independent of the whole-face context, many face-related phenomena are said to depend upon or reflect 'holistic' processing, in which the configuration and inter-relation of features in their natural facial context is critical (de Heering, Houthuys, & Rossion, 2006;Goffaux & Rossion, 2006;Singer & Sheinberg, 2006;Tanaka, Kay, Grinnell, Stansfield, & Szechter, 1998;Yovel & Duchaine, 2006). To examine the role of both facial features and configuration in face adaptation, we performed two additional experiments, one in which features were presented without the normal facial configuration, and another in which the normal facial configuration was preserved but presented with minimal (or impoverished) feature information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This distinct information processing strategy may suggest that participants consider the face more globally when judging familiarity (perhaps in a more holistic manner (e.g. Farah et al, 1995;Goffaux et Rossion, 2006) Our results for the familiarity task are broadly in line with the findings of an eye-tracking study by Hsiao & Cottrell (2008). These authors reported that participants could classify newly learned faces as old (vs. new) from as little as two fixations to the central upper region of the face when they were restricted in the number of fixations they could make (after a set number of fixations the stimulus was replaced by an average face mask).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a great debate has long divided psychologists (e.g., Coelho, Cloete, & Wallis, 2010;Goffaux & Rossion, 2006): What is really processed when attention is directed toward a face in general, or an emotional face in particular: the local features or the face as a whole? Arguments in favor of both sides coexist (e.g., Calvo & Nummenmaa, 2008;Horstmann, Becker, Bergmann, & Burghaus, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%