2022
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac131.347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facemasks and Public Health: analysis of bacterial contamination in FFP2 masks

Abstract: Background Facemasks (FM), due to the Covid-19 pandemic, are extensively used and often worn beyond the recommended time. This has led to questions about the negative impact persistent contamination on FMs might have on public health. The study aims to assess the level of contamination reached in a small cohort of subjects after the recommended use (8 h) of FM. Methods This descriptive study was carried out between January an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that the duration of use has only a subordinate influence on bacterial contamination before irradiation, whereas other user-dependent factors seem to have a greater influence on bacterial contamination: It has been proven that beards in different lengths or styles correlate with an increased amount of CFU found inside a mask. 28 However, due to the equally distributed median duration of use of the masks between our radiation schemes, it can be assumed that these user-dependent factors are also randomly equally distributed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the duration of use has only a subordinate influence on bacterial contamination before irradiation, whereas other user-dependent factors seem to have a greater influence on bacterial contamination: It has been proven that beards in different lengths or styles correlate with an increased amount of CFU found inside a mask. 28 However, due to the equally distributed median duration of use of the masks between our radiation schemes, it can be assumed that these user-dependent factors are also randomly equally distributed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%