2015
DOI: 10.1108/ijilt-09-2014-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facebook in teaching: strengths and weaknesses

Abstract: pennanently, that is, 24/7. In contrast, lecturers are digital immigrants, but we have the responsibility to convert a technology which is likely to become a distraction into a teaching tool that encourages problem-solving, facilitates the use of information sources, improves collaboration and makes possible interaction among students (Siegle, 2011 ).Social networks consequently pe1mit to publish and share infoimation, self-leaming, teamwork, feedback, and contact with experts; in short, they are a perfect too… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(29 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the findings reported by Pearson's social media for teaching and learning survey [20]. Based on a survey to 191 students in the use of Facebook for a closed group discussion, Gonzalez-Ramirez, Gasco, and Taverner [7] reported that students' perceived weaknesses of Facebook in teaching included privacy issues, time required, and technological deficit; while the potential strengths that students predict include performance, communication, participation, and motivation. Students' perceived usefulness of the tool and students' learning achievements were the most frequently studied factors.…”
Section: Student Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with the findings reported by Pearson's social media for teaching and learning survey [20]. Based on a survey to 191 students in the use of Facebook for a closed group discussion, Gonzalez-Ramirez, Gasco, and Taverner [7] reported that students' perceived weaknesses of Facebook in teaching included privacy issues, time required, and technological deficit; while the potential strengths that students predict include performance, communication, participation, and motivation. Students' perceived usefulness of the tool and students' learning achievements were the most frequently studied factors.…”
Section: Student Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In order to study the impact of social media in higher education setting, many researchers conducted explorative studies to investigate the students' perceived learning experience [4,7,12,17,[21][22][23]. Veletsianos and Navarrete [24] conducted a case study utilizing Elgg as the online social network in an online course, and investigated students' perceived learning experience.…”
Section: Student Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies found that satisfaction and participation were associated with improved performance. Some authors have highlighted the value of social networking sites as spaces that facilitate the development of cognitive abilities (Alloway, Horton, Alloway, & Dawson, 2013) and as a means to improve academic performance (Al-Rahmi, Othman, & Yusuf, 2015;González-Ramírez, Gascó, & Llopis-Taverner, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After finding that students already use social media networks such as Facebook to converse with their classmates regarding courses and assessment (Donlan, 2014;Towner & Lego Muñoz, 2011), researchers investigated the use of Facebook for formal learning, including language learning (Annamalai, 2016;Leier, 2017;Omar, Embi, & Yunus, 2012), tourism education (Chen, 2018), and sport coaching (Donlan, 2014). They found that formally assessed Facebook activities were not well-received by students, who struggled to maintain the formal strictures of educational assessment, such as appropriate language and deadlines, on an informal platform (González-Ramírez, Gascó, & Taverner, 2015;Leier, 2017). In addition, students may not wish to engage with their lecturers on Facebook (González-Ramírez et al, 2015), or only passively interacted with the Facebook page/group in question (Chugh & Ruhi, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%