2018
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facebook Groups for the Management of Chronic Diseases

Abstract: The use of Facebook groups by health care researchers and professionals for chronic disease management, namely type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease, is in its early stages and challenges are emerging. While Facebook groups offer great potential to deliver health support, research of Facebook groups for chronic disease management remains in its infancy, with robust evidence not yet available. Designing Facebook groups that are acceptable to users, health care researchers as well as health care pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Online friendships provided a buffer against the isolating impacts of ill health [ 35 ]; this was of particular importance for participants with MND, for whom speech and mobility difficulties may combine to inhibit interactions in the offline world [ 2 ]. Conversations between friends were shared in the open forum, including within the spaces dedicated for specific groups, such as the monthly chemotherapy threads and the board for lesbian and bisexual women on the Breast Cancer Care forum, as well as in external spaces such as closed Facebook groups where privacy may foster even greater intimacy [ 58 ]. Although there is a risk that conversations within these private spaces might take valuable sharing away from the health forum [ 59 ], these alternative spaces were needed and supported practices in everyday life whereby people converse both within groups and more openly within private conversations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online friendships provided a buffer against the isolating impacts of ill health [ 35 ]; this was of particular importance for participants with MND, for whom speech and mobility difficulties may combine to inhibit interactions in the offline world [ 2 ]. Conversations between friends were shared in the open forum, including within the spaces dedicated for specific groups, such as the monthly chemotherapy threads and the board for lesbian and bisexual women on the Breast Cancer Care forum, as well as in external spaces such as closed Facebook groups where privacy may foster even greater intimacy [ 58 ]. Although there is a risk that conversations within these private spaces might take valuable sharing away from the health forum [ 59 ], these alternative spaces were needed and supported practices in everyday life whereby people converse both within groups and more openly within private conversations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recognized downsides such as cyberbullying or delivery of misinformation, social media allows minority groups, for instance patients with chronic diseases, to interact with their peers and overcome isolation and helplessness [12]. Furthermore, online real-time social media platforms address some patients' concern regarding the costs and time-consumption of traditional in-person support programs [13]. The impact of social media in context of chronic diseases has been pointed out by several studies yielding varying results [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, nurses are at the forefront of very innovative models of delivery, for which they are recognised internationally [28,29] Nurses are experts in identifying barriers and challenges in self-management and self-care for patients and take action by being in the vanguard of patient support strategies. Nurses have developed patient-education avatars, gamified applications, and incorporated trackers and engaged in social media in advance of other health disciplines [30][31][32].…”
Section: Leaders Advocates Innovators Educators and Morementioning
confidence: 99%