2014
DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2013.876090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face values: the use of sensitive error correction to address adolescents' ‘face’ issues in the modern languages classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study conducted by Crichton, Templeton, and Valdera (2014) on the concept of "face values" of students when error-correction is done in modern language classrooms, the aim was to narrow down the gap between students and teachers on an explicit pedagogical level. The researchers intended to investigate transparent sensitivity Scottish teachers employ while correcting errors so that students do not lose their credible face wants before their fellow mates; hence, they used implicit affective feedback and used strategies such metalinguistic cues, fuller reformulations, recasts to facilitate the correction process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a study conducted by Crichton, Templeton, and Valdera (2014) on the concept of "face values" of students when error-correction is done in modern language classrooms, the aim was to narrow down the gap between students and teachers on an explicit pedagogical level. The researchers intended to investigate transparent sensitivity Scottish teachers employ while correcting errors so that students do not lose their credible face wants before their fellow mates; hence, they used implicit affective feedback and used strategies such metalinguistic cues, fuller reformulations, recasts to facilitate the correction process.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lyster and Ranta (1997) originally classified error-correction strategies in their study on Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake that was then incorporated by Tedik (1998) in his investigation on error-correction and its pedagogical implications. This classification of error corrective-strategies was then repetitively used by Nassaji (2007), Carranza (2007), Coskun, (2010 , Crichton, Templeton, and Valdera (2014), Alamari and Fawzi (2016) and Ghani and Ahmad (2016) in their respective studies. For its valid and reliable executions in the previous authentic studies, this classification model would be used as an analytical tool to evaluate error-correction strategies used on grade 7 students; the model is as followed:…”
Section: Error Correction Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation