2010
DOI: 10.1080/10481881003716248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face to Face

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The debate has developed into substantial bodies of theory-those on mutual influence, intersubjectivity, the tension between empathy and the recognition of difference, and the expanding definition of co-created conscious and unconscious states, to name a few of the developments enriching current psychoanalytic thinking (Orange, Atwood, & Stolorow, 1997;Buirski and Haglund, 2001;Beebe, Jaffe, and Lachmann, 2002;Orange, 2002). There have also been a number of important, recent engagements with the political edges of intersubjectivity in therapies involving therapist-patient dyads drawn from opposing sides of national, religious, or ideological conflicts (Rozmarin, 2007;Suchet, 2007Suchet, , 2010Shoshani, Shoshani, and Shinar, 2010). These have offered illuminating descriptions of the challenges of confronting identity difference in psychoanalytic work, and simultaneously raise questions that need theoretical scaffolding and integration into our understandings of both subjectivity and technique.…”
Section: Subjectivity and Empathymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The debate has developed into substantial bodies of theory-those on mutual influence, intersubjectivity, the tension between empathy and the recognition of difference, and the expanding definition of co-created conscious and unconscious states, to name a few of the developments enriching current psychoanalytic thinking (Orange, Atwood, & Stolorow, 1997;Buirski and Haglund, 2001;Beebe, Jaffe, and Lachmann, 2002;Orange, 2002). There have also been a number of important, recent engagements with the political edges of intersubjectivity in therapies involving therapist-patient dyads drawn from opposing sides of national, religious, or ideological conflicts (Rozmarin, 2007;Suchet, 2007Suchet, , 2010Shoshani, Shoshani, and Shinar, 2010). These have offered illuminating descriptions of the challenges of confronting identity difference in psychoanalytic work, and simultaneously raise questions that need theoretical scaffolding and integration into our understandings of both subjectivity and technique.…”
Section: Subjectivity and Empathymentioning
confidence: 95%