2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03798-6_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face Reconstruction from Skull Shapes and Physical Attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative to CT scanners is the use of MRI scanners [20,25], which are considered not to be harmful. Again dense soft-tissue depth measurements can be acquired, including differentiation between different types of soft-tissue (muscle, fat).…”
Section: Craniofacial Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative to CT scanners is the use of MRI scanners [20,25], which are considered not to be harmful. Again dense soft-tissue depth measurements can be acquired, including differentiation between different types of soft-tissue (muscle, fat).…”
Section: Craniofacial Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear statistical interpolation of attribute differences is for example used in [18,19] in a postreconstruction mode and in Refs. [20,21] in a pre-reconstruction mode. A linear geometrical interpolation between two reconstructions with different skull properties is used to generate intermediate reconstruction results in Ref.…”
Section: Craniofacial Templatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other instances however might be amenable to joint modelling. Paysan et al [66] made an attempt to learn the relationship between skull-shapes and face-shapes. They use three sets of training data.…”
Section: Joint Instance Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reconstruction result is generally determined by the experience of practitioners. To reduce reconstruction time and eliminate subjective biases, different computeraid craniofacial reconstruction methods have been proposed [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The state-of-the-art of the computer-aid craniofacial reconstruction have comprehensively been reviewed in the surveys [18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So many deformation methods are proposed to model the non-rigid shape deformation of http://asp.eurasipjournals.com/content/2012/1/217 skull and face, such as radial basis functions (RBF) [22,23], or more exactly, a thin plate spline (TPS)-based deformation [12,24,25] for its smoothness. Instead of using fixed template, the recently proposed statistical craniofacial reconstruction methods [12][13][14][15][16][17] construct a type of deformable model from a set of 3D heads by the principle component analysis (PCA) technique. The statistic deformable model can be regarded as a dynamic template for the given skull.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%