2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw.2017.82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face Recognition Performance under Aging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, in Table 6 and Fig. 14, face verification confidence decreases as the time elapsed between two images increases, which conforms to the physical effect of face aging [27] [28]. It may also explain the better performance achieved on CACD in this evaluation, where the maximum mean age gap between the input and synthesized age cluster is 23.09 years, far less than that of 28.61 years achieved on MORPH.…”
Section: Experiments Ii: Aging Model Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Additionally, in Table 6 and Fig. 14, face verification confidence decreases as the time elapsed between two images increases, which conforms to the physical effect of face aging [27] [28]. It may also explain the better performance achieved on CACD in this evaluation, where the maximum mean age gap between the input and synthesized age cluster is 23.09 years, far less than that of 28.61 years achieved on MORPH.…”
Section: Experiments Ii: Aging Model Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Models used in this work are described using two hierarchical levels, similar to those described in [7], [26]. The first level in the hierarchy, Level-1, models the changes in genuine scores, Y i,j , for each subject over time (within-subject variation), whereas, Level-2 model accounts for variation in genuine scores across different subjects (between-subject variation).…”
Section: Multilevel Statistical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the studies conducting in [7], [26], regions containing longitudinal trends for 80% 13 of the child population are plotted using estimated changes in slope and intercept parameters (σ 2 0 , σ 2 1 , σ 01 ). The regions are then used to determine the time lapse until genuine scores for 95% and 99% of the population begin to drop below thresholds at 0.01% and 0.1% FAR.…”
Section: Time Lapsementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There exists a sizable amount of literature on recognition of age-separated face images, such as [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. The existing methods can be categorized as generative or discriminative.…”
Section: Recognition and Retrieval Of Face Images Across Aging Variatmentioning
confidence: 99%