2009
DOI: 10.1049/iet-spr.2008.0173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Face recognition from synchronised visible and near-infrared images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [13], a synchronized visible and near-infrared database is presented, where the authors notice the stability of the performance of all the tested algorithms on infrared images upon illumination variation, and the improvement in performance that results from the fusion of these two different kinds of images. In [14], the authors found that while multi-session thermal face recognition under controlled indoor illumination was statistically poorer than visible recognition with two standard algorithms, significance was substantially reduced with an algorithm more specifically tuned to thermal images.…”
Section: Image Signalsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In [13], a synchronized visible and near-infrared database is presented, where the authors notice the stability of the performance of all the tested algorithms on infrared images upon illumination variation, and the improvement in performance that results from the fusion of these two different kinds of images. In [14], the authors found that while multi-session thermal face recognition under controlled indoor illumination was statistically poorer than visible recognition with two standard algorithms, significance was substantially reduced with an algorithm more specifically tuned to thermal images.…”
Section: Image Signalsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two face images stemmed from a new sensor that was used to simultaneously capture a visible image and a near infrared one. The experiments performed on IRVI database [6] showed that the EER decreased from 1.02 % for the unimodal system based on the near infrared face images to 0.56 % with the fused system.…”
Section: State Of Art Of Biometric Signal Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, some problems can be avoided using different types of sensors. For example, infrared sensors are less sensitive to ambient light as they capture the temperature of the body [8]. As a result, by using the infrared spectrum information of the infrared images, face recognition can potentially offer simpler but more robust solutions, improving the recognition performance in uncontrolled environments [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our method with the face recognition with only visible image or near infrared image. In algorithm 1, the distance between sparse coefficients of the face images according to (8) is applied for face recognition. If we only use the visible or near infrared image, the distance of the face images is computed for face recognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%